Re: TDB inconsistency warning.

On 22/07/14 18:50, Claude Warren wrote: What should I be looking for if I find this error? WARN org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter - Inconsistency: base.allocOffset() = 4121905 : allocOffset = 4121855 I suspect that it is some sort of write without transaction or something like that. Claude

Re: TDB transactions

On 22/07/14 18:45, Claude Warren wrote: Are there any tools to help with debugging multi-threaded TDB Transactions? A transaction opens on one thread is isolated from a transaction opened on another thread. There are Threadlocal variables in the background. The main idiom is to have begin t

Re: Other build jobs

On 22/07/14 19:52, Claude Warren wrote: I suppose I set them up incorrectly. Any idea how to make it do that? Very near the bottom is a section "Build Settings" and tick box "E-mail Notification" which IIRC if you tick asks the email address. Or see the other jobs that are known to shout wh

Strange TDB transaction error

I have seen this error 2x now (or at least I think I have). I am able to duplicate it but I don't have a small self contained example (yet) In the current code I have a couple of threads working on a single Dataset. I am using transactions and as far as I can tell I am in a transaction when the

Re: Other build jobs

I suppose I set them up incorrectly. Any idea how to make it do that? On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > On 22/07/14 18:42, Claude Warren wrote: > >> Jenna Commons was supposed to build the jena-commons experimental code. >> >> Jena New Tests were supposed to build the exp

Re: Other build jobs

On 22/07/14 18:42, Claude Warren wrote: Jenna Commons was supposed to build the jena-commons experimental code. Jena New Tests were supposed to build the experimental new tests. Looking at Jena Commons => Repository URL http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/Experimental/new-test which looks

TDB inconsistency warning.

What should I be looking for if I find this error? WARN org.slf4j.impl.Log4jLoggerAdapter - Inconsistency: base.allocOffset() = 4121905 : allocOffset = 4121855 I suspect that it is some sort of write without transaction or something like that. Claude -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place

TDB transactions

Are there any tools to help with debugging multi-threaded TDB Transactions? I know that I must have some sort of weird error as I create a transaction but when I try to commit I get the "Not active" errors. :( Claude -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web

Re: Other build jobs

Jenna Commons was supposed to build the jena-commons experimental code. Jena New Tests were supposed to build the experimental new tests. On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > I have found two triggered builds - "Jena New Tests" and "Jena Commons" - > both of which don't b

Re: QueryBuilder

On 22/07/14 15:47, Claude Warren wrote: Looking back at the code again.. it does use the Jena Node and Resource clases so it is Jena specific. It could build an ARQ syntax tree -- I just didn't go that far with it. I think there is a need for a Commons and have created jena-commons in the Exper

Re: QueryBuilder

Looking back at the code again.. it does use the Jena Node and Resource clases so it is Jena specific. It could build an ARQ syntax tree -- I just didn't go that far with it. I think there is a need for a Commons and have created jena-commons in the Experimental branch. Currently that only conta

[jira] [Closed] (JENA-749) StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne closed JENA-749. -- > StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface. > -

[jira] [Resolved] (JENA-749) StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-749. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: Jena 2.12.0 > StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a sep

Re: QueryBuilder

On 21/07/14 20:34, Claude Warren wrote: I have code for a query builder that I would like to contribute... but I don't see a good place to put the code. It is not Jena specific. So it's string based? Can it (could it) build an ARQ syntax tree? That avoid the need to parse, and makes it

Other build jobs

I have found two triggered builds - "Jena New Tests" and "Jena Commons" - both of which don't build and haven't for several days. But they build the same codebase? What's the difference? (Claude?) Andy

Re: [jira] [Commented] (JENA-749) StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface.

I've applied the StreamRDF-tuple-removal changes and kicked off a deployment build of Jena to get the changes into SNAPSHOTs, rather than wait for tomorrow. Andy

Re: GSoC - Jena 650 - Define SPARQL commands in Jena rules

Hi Andy, in a first glance, the problem stated in my email of 16/July is a non-issue. However, I will see again. I have some doubts if a SPARQL command can produce new data that can be false when new deductions are performed. I will deepen my study and, if necessary, prepare a show case. My

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-749) StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070132#comment-14070132 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-749: -- Commit 1612543

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070097#comment-14070097 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-648: -- Commit 1612535

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070104#comment-14070104 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-648: -- Commit 1612541

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070101#comment-14070101 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-648: I have added staged documentation that mentions that this f

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070099#comment-14070099 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-648: -- Commit 1612537

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070092#comment-14070092 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-648: -- Commit 1612533

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070083#comment-14070083 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-648: Have re-enabled the {{LocationLock}} functionality and afte

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-749) StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070071#comment-14070071 ] Rob Vesse commented on JENA-749: +1 Patches look good > StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handlin

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-648) Make TDB datasets harder to corrupt

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14070070#comment-14070070 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-648: -- Commit 1612519

Re: Jena 2.12.0 release?

+1 Yes I think we are probably about ready I would like to get JENA-648 (TDB LocationLock's) enabled, thanks for spotting and fixing the cause of the Windows failures. I will enable that shortly and make sure everything builds nicely now The Hadoop RDF stuff has some basic infrastructure for ar

[jira] [Updated] (JENA-749) StreamRDF : remove "tuples" handling into a separate interface.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andy Seaborne updated JENA-749: --- Attachment: jena749-no-tuples-hadoop-rdf-io.patch jena749-no-tuples-arq-tdb-fuseki.patch