This is a message stack for Graph SPI Contract testing. It covers only the
Jena 2 Graph Contract. This an attempt to document the current Graph
contract. Any correction should specify the bullet point number.
1. add() -- technically from GraphAdd
1. when a triple is added to a graph al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14091239#comment-14091239
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-762:
--
Commit 1616868
On 08/08/14 10:15, Miguel Bento Alves wrote:
Hi all,
In a Sparql query, we can extract the query pattern ( q.getQueryPattern() ).
For instance, in the sparql command:
Select ?x ?p ?z where {?x ?p ?y . ?x ?z.}
we can extract:
{ ?x ?p ?y .
?x ?z
}
Is there any
Andy Seaborne created JENA-762:
--
Summary: Provide a registry for result set readers and writers.
Key: JENA-762
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-762
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14091192#comment-14091192
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-648:
Jena 2.12.0 is out - should we close this as "done"
On 08/08/14 15:27, Miguel Bento Alves wrote:
Hi Dave,
“...I would recommend doing so as a built-in…”.
I did that and worked for some examples. However, I couldn’t generalise the
processing. In RETEforward the rules are triggered in response of triples
fired. When we have a rule with one one sp
Hi Dave,
“...I would recommend doing so as a built-in…”.
I did that and worked for some examples. However, I couldn’t generalise the
processing. In RETEforward the rules are triggered in response of triples
fired. When we have a rule with one one sparql command nothing trigger the
rule. Furthe
Hi Miguel,
I found this hard to follow.
There shouldn't be any problem embedding SPARQL queries into forward
rules so that they can see the deduced data. The hard issue is that the
forward engine has no support for primitives that return streams of
bindings.
To embed a SPARQL query in forwa
Hi All,
I couldn't implement the hook between a Sparql command and rules terms. In my
opinion, only make sense hook a Sparql command and rules terms if in the sparql
command we can invoke variables from rules terms. Something like:
(?x ?y),
(\\\sparql Select ?z where {&y ?z .}
Hi all,
In a Sparql query, we can extract the query pattern ( q.getQueryPattern() ).
For instance, in the sparql command:
Select ?x ?p ?z where {?x ?p ?y . ?x ?z.}
we can extract:
{ ?x ?p ?y .
?x ?z
}
Is there anyway to extract as TriplePattern?
Also, we ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-759.
Resolution: Not a Problem
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> New Version of HTTP client throw HTTP400 er
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090483#comment-14090483
]
ArthurVaisse-Lesteven commented on JENA-759:
I'll contact strabon developpers, i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090470#comment-14090470
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-759 at 8/8/14 8:39 AM:
Does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090470#comment-14090470
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-759 at 8/8/14 8:30 AM:
Does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090470#comment-14090470
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-759:
Does the strabon endpoint deal with content negotia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14090427#comment-14090427
]
ArthurVaisse-Lesteven commented on JENA-759:
The setting of HttpQuery.urlLimit t
16 matches
Mail list logo