Claude Warren created JENA-861:
--
Summary: org.apache.jena.security.impl.SecuredItemInvoker uses
wrong method
Key: JENA-861
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-861
Project: Apache Jena
Background:
1. TDBGraph implements org.apache.jena.atlas.lib.Closable which defines
a close() method
2. Graph does not.
3. DatasetGraphMaker.close() calls close() on the defaultGraph.
The security system creates dynamic proxies.
When a TDBGraph is closed the method that is being atte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14290545#comment-14290545
]
Claude Warren commented on JENA-861:
Background:
1. TDBGraph implements org.apache.
+1 -- Moving to Java 7 should include a comprehensive review of which classes
should become closable to enable try-with-resources.
Ideally, the Jena code base should also use try-with-resources internally
wherever that makes sense.
Note that in some cases extending AutoCloseable might be prefer
On 24/01/15 15:36, Ian Emmons wrote:
+1 -- Moving to Java 7 should include a comprehensive review of which classes
should become closable to enable try-with-resources.
What would be really great is if you'd look through the codebase and
make suggestions as to where it makes sense.
(we have
On 24/01/15 11:01, Claude Warren wrote:
Background:
1. TDBGraph implements org.apache.jena.atlas.lib.Closable which defines
a close() method
2. Graph does not.
3. DatasetGraphMaker.close() calls close() on the defaultGraph.
The security system creates dynamic proxies.
When a TD
== Jena 2.*
Some first thoughts for the next release ...
What number should it be? We may have have new components:
* OSGi bundle
* Adds Fuseki2 (as 2.0.0); Fuseki1 still there
* jena-elephas?
(If this works for you, Rob - no strong advocacy either way)
* Anything else I've forgotten.
We do
Here is a suggestion for Jena3.
After 2.12.2 or 2.12.3,
1/ A branch for Jena2 ; master is Jena3.
2/ Switch to RDF 1.1 setting for strings
3/ Rename com.hp.hpl.jena packages to org.apache.jena
4/ Other changes
5/ Let things settle down.
6/ Release (beta? just go for it as 3.0.0?)
(3) is the disr
[[
oaj = org.apache.jena
chhj = com.hp.hpl.jena
]]
One major possible change target is the core/arq split.
Much of this comes down to where quads/datasets go in the package tree.
They started as a SPARQL (1.0) feature but are now RDF 1.1 and parser
related.
The general idea is move dataset/
Removing closable from TDBGraph? No.
Removing closable from the proxy? No, It proxies all the interfaces from
the original object so that the contracts of the original object are not
broken.
I changed the proxy so that if a method with the same signature is found it
calls the one on the secured
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14290826#comment-14290826
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-859:
--
Commit 11582310
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-861?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14290825#comment-14290825
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-861:
--
Commit 02af44d5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14290850#comment-14290850
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-396:
Can we close this JIRA?
> Request for Info
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Claude Warren closed JENA-396.
--
Resolution: Not a Problem
> Request for Info
>
>
> Key: JENA-396
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
