Hello,
Please check my reply below:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Ying Jiang wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> Now, we are at "proposal ranking phase 1: indicate willingness to
> mentor", with the deadline of April 12 00:00 UTC. I've already
> registered as a "Possible mentor" for Qihong's proposal. Not
Hello,
Chiming in just to say that if necessary I can help testing the JavaCC part. I
was working on JENA-632, which is still being reviewed, but it included changes
in ARQ and in the JavaCC grammar.
One thing that could be helpful, I think, is extracting the main method created
for JENA-632 [
The command line tools work with the extended ARQ syntax if:
1/ The file name ends ".arq"
or
2/ --syntax arq
so you can use qparse to test queries.
"qparse" also does some internal testing - it parses the query, prints
the parsed form (so it does query -> string), reparses and tests that
hash
Oh, so I started working with the JavaCC grammar by running Fuseki, and later
wrote that main method, but I could have used qparse? I liked the main method
because I did not have to re-compile the project, since I could simply update
the JavaCC grammar and run the generated parser.
Can I get the
Github user osma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/51#issuecomment-92086474
Hi Alexis!
> For the moment, it's the responsability of the client code to commit or
rollback the index (finishIndexing() or abortIndexing() methods) in phase with
the
