[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-926.
Resolution: Done
> Remove GraphStore
> -
>
> Key: JENA-926
>
Done.
Please do say if you discover any bad consequences.
Andy
On 09/05/15 12:00, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JENA-926
Branch: jena926-remove-graphstore
The GraphStore abstraction does not add anything and could be got rid
of. Branch 'jena926-remove-graphstore' contains the changed code.
A "gr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542748#comment-14542748
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-926:
--
Commit 1ecb27cc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-934?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542745#comment-14542745
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-934:
--
Commit 8eeb060c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-940.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0
The specific issue with {{SERVICE}} is addressed bu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542679#comment-14542679
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-942:
This is a manifestation of Java bug
https://bugs.o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-942:
---
Description:
If dbpedia.org generates XML 1.1 results, then
{noformat}
com.hp.hpl.jena.sparql.resultse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-942?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-942:
---
Description:
If dbpedia.org generates XML 1.1 results, then the use of {{}} or any XML tag with {{<.../>
Andy Seaborne created JENA-942:
--
Summary: XML results from dbpedia.org can not be parsed.
Key: JENA-942
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-942
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Bug
Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/64#issuecomment-101808418
Ok, I will separate it to have a distinct behavior.
Removing the isMultilingual() method will probably force to switch some
private fields and/or methods to protected
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542649#comment-14542649
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-940 at 5/13/15 8:40 PM:
-
Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542669#comment-14542669
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-938:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542666#comment-14542666
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-938:
--
Commit 669c856b
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/63
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542665#comment-14542665
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-938:
--
Commit f4890c56
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542667#comment-14542667
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-938:
--
Commit 34bf660f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542664#comment-14542664
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-938:
--
Commit 61884bfc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542649#comment-14542649
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-940:
This is a manifestation of Java bug
https://bugs.o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-939.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.0.0
Assignee: Rob Vesse
> Regression - incorre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542522#comment-14542522
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-939:
The problem that this JIRA is reports is now fixed
Github user osma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/64#issuecomment-101780700
This looks very promising. As I've said before, I think a single index is
preferable to multiple indexes. It should require less book-keeping overall.
I have to say I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542481#comment-14542481
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-938:
-
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/63#issuecomment-101780453
Okay, whatever is useful is hopefully there for you without too much
trouble. Let me know if I can help-- part of my personal motive for these
wild-swinging "clean up" PRs is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542475#comment-14542475
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-938:
-
Github user afs commented on the pull request:
Github user afs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/63#issuecomment-101780114
Generally yes - fixes are better when possible. In this case though (on
`.factory`) there is a coding pattern than was fine at the time and now isn't.
The hiding effect is du
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
A. Soroka updated JENA-941:
---
Summary: Upgrade code quality reports in Jena build to versions for Java 8
(was: Add code quality reports to Je
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542218#comment-14542218
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-941:
-
GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request:
htt
GitHub user ajs6f opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/65
JENA-941: Upgrading code quality plugin versions
This patch upgrades the code quality reporting plugins in use to versions
that will work with Java 8, re-enabling `mvn site`.
You can merge this pull req
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542181#comment-14542181
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-941:
It looks like those plugins _are_ in jena-parent, but the v
There seems to be some consensus that it would be nice to bring in some
automated code quality facilities for Jena. So far, the ones that have been
mentioned are:
1) Sonar, which is on the way-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9469
2) FindBugs, for which good Maven support exists:
A. Soroka created JENA-941:
--
Summary: Add code quality reports to Jena build
Key: JENA-941
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-941
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542140#comment-14542140
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-938:
-
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/63#issuecomment-101722026
I didn't see any such expansion of warnings, but that may have to do with
my IDE settings.
Generally, my take is that it's better to remove the warnings by fixing the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542099#comment-14542099
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-928:
-
GitHub user amiara514 opened a pull request:
GitHub user amiara514 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/64
Jena-text multilingual alternative implementation
This proposal is an alternative of
[pull52](https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/52) (JENA-928).
It deals with a single index that includes langua
I've actually been wondering a good deal about StreamRDF and whether (and how)
it could go in just the direction you suggest.
When you say "a new API" do you mean an independent module that would be an
exclusive choice? In other words, a module one could use to interact with Jena
to the exclusi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542074#comment-14542074
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-940:
In relation to OpenJDK there is a thread about moving to 2.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542071#comment-14542071
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-940:
Well looking in my JDK (which is Oracle) I see a positively
Github user osma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/52#issuecomment-101707948
Good that you got it working! Yes, I think opening a new pull request makes
sense - or just merge the work to this one, whatever is easiest for you.
---
If your project is se
On 12/05/15 15:26, A. Soroka wrote:
At:
http://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/implementations.html
It says "Apache Jena is considering a compatibility interface that provides and
consumes Commons RDF objects."
I'm wondering if there have been any experiments to that end, or whether Jena
is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14542008#comment-14542008
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-940:
Hmm - seems to be correct in Xerces 2.11.0 (and has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541946#comment-14541946
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-940:
--
Commit 10f899e3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541943#comment-14541943
]
Rob Vesse edited comment on JENA-940 at 5/13/15 1:55 PM:
-
Ah I see w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541943#comment-14541943
]
Rob Vesse edited comment on JENA-940 at 5/13/15 1:52 PM:
-
Ah I see w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541943#comment-14541943
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-940:
Ah I see what the difference between the two code paths is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541922#comment-14541922
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-940 at 5/13/15 1:40 PM:
-
Lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541922#comment-14541922
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-940:
Looking at the Xerces code the NPE is
{{XML11NSDo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541916#comment-14541916
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-940:
On SO there is an [answer|http://stackoverflow.com/a/107293
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541879#comment-14541879
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-940 at 5/13/15 1:25 PM:
-
Cu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541894#comment-14541894
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-940:
Also someone else hitting this on SO -
http://stackoverflo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541888#comment-14541888
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-940:
Xerces 2.11.0 claims to support XML 1.1 according to
http:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541879#comment-14541879
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-940:
Current Jena uses the latest XercesImpl 2.11.0.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541874#comment-14541874
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-940:
See also:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-940:
---
Description:
I've specified Affects versions against the version of Jena that I've tested,
although it
Robert Mercer created JENA-940:
--
Summary: SPARQL SERVICE Query against dbpedia.org doesnt work
Key: JENA-940
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-940
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sören Brunk updated JENA-914:
-
Description:
Currently, Jena can't be used on Android as is, due to multiple issues caused
by differences b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sören Brunk updated JENA-914:
-
Summary: Get Jena working on Android (was: Get Jena working on the Android
OS)
> Get Jena working on Andro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541769#comment-14541769
]
Sören Brunk commented on JENA-914:
--
Replacing xerces would make things a lot easier but the
Comments inline:
On 11/05/2015 23:23, "Paul Houle" wrote:
>I've processed cumulative terabytes of data with
>
>https://github.com/paulhoule/infovore
>
>which was developed pre-Elephas. One issue I have is that at this scale
>the reader has to be 100% bombproof. Every triple I read is on a sing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541657#comment-14541657
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-939:
--
Commit 1e505a8a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541604#comment-14541604
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-939 at 5/13/15 9:07 AM:
-
Co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541619#comment-14541619
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-939:
Looking at the "fix" this is probably going to break advanc
Sorry Rob, that was an example, but I forgot to emphasize that.
Bruno
From: Rob Vesse
To: dev@jena.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Code policies
80 columns? I sincerely hope not
120 is the bare minimum in this day and age, we aren't coding on CRTs an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541604#comment-14541604
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-939:
--
Commit 53af5b20
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14541599#comment-14541599
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-939:
Regression occurred 2.13.0 -> 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT
Intro
80 columns? I sincerely hope not
120 is the bare minimum in this day and age, we aren't coding on CRTs any
more people!
Rob
On 12/05/2015 22:22, "Bruno P. Kinoshita" wrote:
>I think that something like checkstyle, PMD and FindBugs, and update the
>contribution page asking contributors to revi
66 matches
Mail list logo
