Github user afs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-113289019
Great - I'll integrate it as soon as I have a moment free to do so.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user amiara514 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/53#issuecomment-113273093
@afs like for the other doc I put it in a gist :
https://gist.github.com/amiara514/ef839adb7c5cb9dd697d
It covers only the "Deletion of Indexed Entities" section of
t
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/6570c25be8c6e958a5647a7d2c1e23466498b332#commitcomment-11746591
Oh, I see you added a different commit-- cool!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14591752#comment-14591752
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
Yes. Is that problematic? Isn't the larger strategy to shif
Github user ajs6f commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/6570c25be8c6e958a5647a7d2c1e23466498b332#commitcomment-11746416
Okay, but isn't the build broken now?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14591746#comment-14591746
]
A. Soroka commented on JENA-966:
I don't think iterator refactoring is what is being discuss
Hi Qihong,
You may have already received an email from Google, which reminded us
of the mid-term evaluation for the GSoC project. The evaluation will
start next Friday, 26 June. The deadline to submit your evaluation is
19:00 UTC on Friday, 3 July. Please make sure not to miss it.
More importantl
DOH!
Thank you Andy for pointing out the obvious.
Claude
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> On 18/06/15 07:26, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I seem to be going around in circles with the fuseki documentation.
>>
>> Does Fuseki support the POST command as noted at
>> http://www
On 18/06/15 07:26, Claude Warren wrote:
I seem to be going around in circles with the fuseki documentation.
Does Fuseki support the POST command as noted at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-http-rdf-update-20130321/#http-post
To reword slightly to make the boundary clear: my emphasis:
[
