[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15581793#comment-15581793
]
Stian Soiland-Reyes commented on JENA-1169:
---
Yes, there's no legal requirement fo
On 14/10/16 11:59, A. Soroka wrote:
...
6/ Packets of change.
To have 4 (label a patch with reversible) and 5 (the version details), there
needs to be somewhere to put the information. Having it in the patch itself
means that the whole unit can be stored in a file. If it is in the protocol
Hi Claude,
There is certainly interest from me.
What the best thing to do depends on various factors. By putting it in
extras I presume you mean it gets added to the release? That is not the
only way forward.
An important aspect of Apache is "Community over code" - will there be a
communi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582037#comment-15582037
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-1169 at 10/17/16 12:04 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582037#comment-15582037
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1169:
-
Right - it's only the binaries that need an expo
Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179#discussion_r83655593
--- Diff: jena-fuseki1/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/ServerCtl.java
---
@@ -18,39 +18,113 @@
package org.apache.jena.fuseki;
+import s
Github user ajs6f commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179#discussion_r83656694
--- Diff: jena-fuseki1/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/ServerCtl.java
---
@@ -18,39 +18,113 @@
package org.apache.jena.fuseki;
+import s
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 6:21 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> An "HTTP header"-like form (key-value lines) would be better because it is an
> open design where new header fields can be put in as needed. (e.g. "Author",
> "Date", "Signed-off-by").
>
> It could be done as a different style, maybe iden
There's also:
https://github.com/cumulusrdf/cumulusrdf
in a similar vein (RDF over Cassandra). Not sure what kind of particular uses
it expects to support.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Hi Claude,
>
> There is certai
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179
`AbstractFusekiTest` -- it isn't so simple though as there is only one
super class and it ends up competing for that. And the Auth tests need to be
different again.
So this PR is just Fuseki1, Fus
Github user afs closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582446#comment-15582446
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1245:
--
Github user afs closed the pull request at:
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179
(Wrong button again)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
GitHub user afs reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/179
Reorganise control of a test Fuseki server for HTTP API testing.
JENA-1245
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena http_testin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15582455#comment-15582455
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1245:
--
GitHub user afs reopened a pull request:
IIRC It stores CBDs indexed by subject so it is the "other" model to
Rya. Better for LDP (??).
Andy
On 17/10/16 15:41, A. Soroka wrote:
There's also:
https://github.com/cumulusrdf/cumulusrdf
in a similar vein (RDF over Cassandra). Not sure what kind of particular uses
it expects to
Yep,
http://iswc2011.semanticweb.org/fileadmin/iswc/Papers/Workshops/SSWS/Ladwig-et-all-SSWS2011.pdf
indicates that they are indexing by subject. As someone who has implemented
LDP, that is definitely the approach that makes sense there.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Oc
I like DynamoDB as a target for this sort of thing. There are many
tasks which are small-scale yet critical where it would otherwise be
hard to provide a distributed and reliable database. Put that together
with Lambda, which does the same for computation, and you are cooking
with gas.
I wrote
18 matches
Mail list logo