[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15624709#comment-15624709
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1255:
---
Commit 63cd4
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1255?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1255.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.1.1
{{ServicesResou
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/187
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15625046#comment-15625046
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1169:
---
Commit cb1fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15625048#comment-15625048
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1169:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15625047#comment-15625047
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1169:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Process executed and notice to US Gov sent.
I've also written to legal-discuss@ to check whats beendone. If theer is
feedback there, I might need to refine the entry on the ASF exports page.
Thanks to Stian for making sure this was done.
Andy
On 30/10/16 15:42, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Osma Suominen updated JENA-1257:
Attachment: explain.zip
> Bad performance with VALUES blocks
> --
>
>
On 30/10/16 22:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
When the export updates are in, I'll start the 3.1.1 release process
(exactly when subject to time available!).
Unless ...?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257
Sorry for not catching this earlier. But I think this needs
investigation before
Now that the export registration is done, this release can be started.
It'll have to done around other work unless someone else wants to RM it.
At this point, it is a matter of executing the process at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JENA/Release+Process
I have taken a clean loca
I do not think I have anywhere near enough experience yet to RM, but I would
like to be as involved as is convenient so that at some future point, I _can_
do a release.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Nov 1, 2016, at 9:50 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Now that the export
Osma Suominen created JENA-1257:
---
Summary: Bad performance with VALUES blocks
Key: JENA-1257
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Bug
On 01/11/16 13:49, Osma Suominen wrote:
On 30/10/16 22:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
When the export updates are in, I'll start the 3.1.1 release process
(exactly when subject to time available!).
Unless ...?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257
Sorry for not catching this earlier. B
01.11.2016, 16:32, Andy Seaborne kirjoitti:
I heard about that was 9am this morning (my time) on users@.
Yes, I only noticed it yesterday afternoon.
There is something to investigate but I think it is better is to release
3.1.1 now and do 3.1.2 shortly afterwards if needed. The reason for t
Sounds in some ways like two different efforts. Jena brings a lot of
assumptions and machinery that aren't present and won't ever be present in
Commons. I could see a SPARQL-less Commons impl over Cassandra being useful for
the LDP-style use case, but that doesn't sound like what Claude is tryin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15626807#comment-15626807
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1257:
-
This appears to be related to the changes for JE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1257:
Comment: was deleted
(was: This appears to be related to the changes for JENA-1171. That introduced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15626827#comment-15626827
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1257:
-
This is not the same situation as the [reference
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15626833#comment-15626833
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1257:
-
This appears to be related to the changes for JE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15626907#comment-15626907
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1233:
-
Did the serialization wrappers {{SNode}}, {{STri
21 matches
Mail list logo
