(switched to dev@, not marked [VOTE])
These are the headline items I think need to go in the announcement message:
RDF Connection
JENA-1267
http://jena.apache.org/documentation/notes/rdfconnection.html
(on staging ATM)
Serializable for Quad/triple/Node
Link to javadoc: org.apache.jena.syste
Following up on one of Andy’s comments In line:
On 23/01/2017 19:02, "Andy Seaborne" wrote:
Hi there - good to hear from you.
I hope all these pointers in the thread are helpful.
On 22/01/17 15:31, A. Soroka wrote:
> First, to your specific questions:
>
>> 1. At
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849750#comment-15849750
]
Rob Vesse commented on JENA-1275:
-
Thanks for the diagnosis and fix, this should resolve ou
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
We should already have support for most of the trigonometric functions
built into ARQ as extension functions -
https://github.com/apache/jena/tree/59e5e06c85c98c9c65a9c1addbc4252626e9d061/jena-arq/src/m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15849756#comment-15849756
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1277:
--
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
+1 (binding)
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Monday, 6 February, 23:59 UTC
Thanks to everyone who can help test and give feedback of every kind!
ajs6
On 01/02/17 16:09, A. Soroka wrote:
Hello, Jena-folks!
Let's vote on a release of Jena 3.2.0.
Congratulations!
All looks good to me.
I like the idea of sending it to users@ as well.
The Jenkins development build seems to have got out of sync (I thiunk
this has happened before - my guess
GitHub user retnor opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/214
Small changes
Omit the last '/' in line 32 will make this code work
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/retnor/jena patch-1
Alternative
GitHub user afs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/215
JSON improvements
A number of small improvement to the JSON handling code, motivated by
working with it in another project.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pu
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/215
A big +1 to the `return this;` idiom. It's very convenient in this kind of
work.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/214
Looks good-- I'll merge this after we finish with the current release
process. Thanks @retnor !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
+1 (non-binding)
Works on OS X
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>
>>>[ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>[ ] 0 Don't care
>>>[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
>>>
>>> This vote will be open to the end of
>
+1 (binding)
The release candidate itself was generated on a Mac, so that's a box checked.
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Aaron Coburn wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Works on OS X
>
>> On Feb 2, 2017, at 7:02 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>> +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850587#comment-15850587
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1284:
--
Github user afs commented on a diff in the pul
Github user afs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/212#discussion_r99232613
--- Diff: jena-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/graph/GraphUtil.java ---
@@ -115,55 +117,44 @@ public static void add(Graph graph, Triple[] triples)
{
}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850623#comment-15850623
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1284:
--
Github user afs commented on the issue:
h
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/212
> configurable percentage
For similar sized graphs, are the two choices very different in
performance? I can't see it but I'm maybe too close to the code.
I believe/hope this PR is only ev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850624#comment-15850624
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1284:
--
Github user afs commented on the issue:
h
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/212
@rvesse : It came up when reviewing code; I don't have figures either way.
We have situations of deleting small graphs from large ones and deleting large
graphs from small ones (and empty ones). The size r
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/212
> materialising the list of triples a potential memory issue
Yes :-( but the new code is supposed to materialize the smaller side of the
operation so is a (small) improvement over the existing case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15850627#comment-15850627
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1284:
--
Github user afs commented on the issue:
h
21 matches
Mail list logo
