[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397268#comment-16397268
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-632:
-
Github user afs commented on the issue:
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/114
Conversion code (draft): 2dd4418a22 (on a branch in my GH at the moment).
The code is in `RDFTerm2Json.fromNode`.
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397107#comment-16397107
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1507:
--
GitHub user afs opened a pull request:
GitHub user afs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/382
JENA-1507: Fixes for aggregates when no WHERE match.
This includes the two commits of PR #381.
Commit 8a64ffee are the actual functional changes for JENA-1507.
You can merge this pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397081#comment-16397081
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1507:
-
The SPARQL spec is wrong as well:
In the definition of "Group",
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16397043#comment-16397043
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1487:
-
See JENA-1507.
> Incorrect SPARQL query result set when
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1507:
---
Summary: GROUP BY and aggregates when there are no matching of the
WHERE pattern.
Key: JENA-1507
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1507
Project: Apache
GitHub user afs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/381
Reformat QueryIterGroup; no test out from TestParameterizedSparqlString
Reformat `QueryIterGroup` prior to work on aggregates.
Remove print out in from `TestParameterizedQueryString`.
Remove a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16396750#comment-16396750
]
Bruno P. Kinoshita commented on JENA-1488:
--
>The DefinedFilter solution sounds like the best from