Re: CMS diff: Functions in ARQ

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
Done - thanks. Andy On 12/12/2018 13:45, Anonymous CMS User wrote: Clone URL (Committers only): https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.apache.org/documentation%2Fquery%2Flibrary-function.mdtext Index:

[GitHub] jena issue #473: Extendable versions of classes for printing result sets

2018-12-12 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/473 @hartig - see PR #507 ; that should allow you to `ResultSetWriterRegistry.register(SPARQLResultSetText, )` to set your own text output engine. For grabbing the prologue, see:

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
I only released Apache Commons components. Would Jena be too different/complex? I have GitHub 2FA, ASF gpg keys (4096), Maven settings.xml set up for ASF maven repo. So if the process is not too hard for a beginner, I can volunteer to either sidekick and review/learn the process, or to RM

Re: website to git Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Coming back from a recess, so I think issues like these are easier for me to help with - and I did something similar before. It shouldn't be too complicated, but not sure if we can use Jekyll. As far as I know, GitHub pages runs Ruby + Jekyll for every commit to the GitHub pages branch.

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
We did the migration in Apache OpenNLP, moving also from the Apache CMS to a Java based alternative to Ruby Jekyll. But for Jena I think the easiest now would be to move everything to gitbox, and then use gitpubsub instead of svnpubsub to publish the site. Cheers Bruno

Re: [VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-12 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
+1 And I should have time for OSS development again from now until Feb next year. So happy to help. Thanks Bruno From: Andy Seaborne To: "dev@jena.apache.org" Sent: Thursday, 13 December 2018 7:19 AM Subject: [VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

[GitHub] jena pull request #506: Cleanup of comments and javadoc. Trivial fixes.

2018-12-12 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/506 ---

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1648) Make the result set text format a first-class ResultSetLang for output.

2018-12-12 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16719305#comment-16719305 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1648: -- GitHub user afs opened a pull request:

[GitHub] jena pull request #507: JENA-1648: First class text format for result sets.

2018-12-12 Thread afs
GitHub user afs opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/507 JENA-1648: First class text format for result sets. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/afs/jena text-format Alternatively you can

Re: [VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-12 Thread ajs6f
+1 Approve the move ajs6f > On Dec 12, 2018, at 1:21 PM, Chris Tomlinson > wrote: > > +1 To move code repo from git-wip-us to gitbox as soon as possible > > Chris > >> On Dec 12, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >> As per: email: >>

[jira] [Created] (JENA-1648) Make the result set text format a first-class ResultSetLang for output.

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne (JIRA)
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1648: --- Summary: Make the result set text format a first-class ResultSetLang for output. Key: JENA-1648 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1648 Project: Apache

Re: [VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
+1 On 12/12/2018 18:18, Andy Seaborne wrote: (with deadline) As per: email: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5762798313a642dc90076e3562c83457571d92758d0d73e6010af0d0@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E this is a vote to move the code repo from git-wip-us.apache.org to the gitbox.apache.org

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 12/12/2018 15:53, Chris Tomlinson wrote: Hi Andy, On Dec 12, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 11/12/2018 17:19, Chris Tomlinson wrote: Hi Andy, My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno once jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH

website to git Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
I'd like to move the site. On 12/12/2018 15:25, ajs6f wrote: I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time. Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done nothing. Bruno-- I think you had some thoughts about the site question? I seem to remember that you did

Re: [VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-12 Thread Chris Tomlinson
+1 To move code repo from git-wip-us to gitbox as soon as possible Chris > On Dec 12, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > As per: email: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5762798313a642dc90076e3562c83457571d92758d0d73e6010af0d0@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E > > this is a vote to move

[VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
(with deadline) As per: email: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5762798313a642dc90076e3562c83457571d92758d0d73e6010af0d0@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E this is a vote to move the code repo from git-wip-us.apache.org to the gitbox.apache.org service, which includes direct write access on github.

[VOTE] Move the code repo to gitbox.apache.org

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
As per: email: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5762798313a642dc90076e3562c83457571d92758d0d73e6010af0d0@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E this is a vote to move the code repo from git-wip-us.apache.org to the gitbox.apache.org service, which includes direct write access on github. If the vote

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Chris Tomlinson
Hi Andy, > On Dec 12, 2018, at 7:35 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > > On 11/12/2018 17:19, Chris Tomlinson wrote: >> Hi Andy, >> My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno >> once jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH or both in our >> individual

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread ajs6f
I'm all in favor, and in favor of moving the site to git at the same time. Indeed, we've discussed that latter before, but done nothing. Bruno-- I think you had some thoughts about the site question? I seem to remember that you did such a migration with another Apache project? ajs6f > On Dec

[GitHub] jena pull request #506: Cleanup of comments and javadoc. Trivial fixes.

2018-12-12 Thread afs
GitHub user afs opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/506 Cleanup of comments and javadoc. Trivial fixes. Remove one "abstract" in an interface. Correct QueryExecUtils handling of RDF-format result sets. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository

CMS diff: Functions in ARQ

2018-12-12 Thread Anonymous CMS User
Clone URL (Committers only): https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.apache.org/documentation%2Fquery%2Flibrary-function.mdtext Index: trunk/content/documentation/query/library-function.mdtext ===

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Jena repo to gitbox or github

2018-12-12 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 11/12/2018 17:19, Chris Tomlinson wrote: Hi Andy, My GH and ASF accounts are linked. As I understand the note from D.Gruno once jena is moved to GB then we can use either GB or GH or both in our individual workflows. For me just working with GH would be my choice. I’m not sure how far

[GitHub] jena issue #473: Extendable versions of classes for printing result sets

2018-12-12 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/473 Jena is already extensible for results formats. See `ResultSetWriterRegistry` and `ResultSetReaderRegistry`. I'm sorry there is old code around but, well, time ... . Adding

[GitHub] jena issue #473: Extendable versions of classes for printing result sets

2018-12-12 Thread hartig
Github user hartig commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/473 > Where and how are you wanting to output text format? Where? In the command line tool for executing SPARQL* queries (see [`ExecuteSPARQLStar` in