[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721886#comment-16721886
]
Code Ferret commented on JENA-1652:
---
I haven't figured it out yet; however, it appears t
For the message going out the focus is removing the modules, especially
the ones going first.
If anyone asks we can point to it and it's not likely in 3.10.0.
And we can have a GeoSPARQL announcement specifically.
Andy
On 13/12/2018 14:46, ajs6f wrote:
Basically LGTM, but it might be nice
Excellent news.
On Fri 14 Dec 2018 at 20:00, Greg Albiston wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> The JTS project has been re-licenced last year as Eclipse Publish
> License and Eclipse Distribution License, which are Apache compatible
> AFAIK.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Greg
>
> On 14/12/2018 19:53, Marco Neumann wrote:
Hi Marco,
The JTS project has been re-licenced last year as Eclipse Publish
License and Eclipse Distribution License, which are Apache compatible AFAIK.
Thanks,
Greg
On 14/12/2018 19:53, Marco Neumann wrote:
In addition could you or someone with an Apache connection clarify the
situation ar
In addition could you or someone with an Apache connection clarify the
situation around the JTS license. I remember that the Lucene project voted
not to include the JTS dependencies due to its LGPL license. Is that not an
issue anymore? Is there a different situation for the Jena project?
On Fri 1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721694#comment-16721694
]
Code Ferret edited comment on JENA-1652 at 12/14/18 7:51 PM:
-
Hi,
I've been looking at the jena-spatial module and Marco's feedback for
transferring the GeoSPARQL-Jena/Fuskei projects into Jena. I've done
some work on providing the jena-spatial property function for backward
compatibility, but using the core elements from GeoSPARQL-Jena.
This means tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721694#comment-16721694
]
Code Ferret commented on JENA-1652:
---
[~osma] I used {{skos:testLabel}} since I have an e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721691#comment-16721691
]
Code Ferret commented on JENA-1652:
---
Another data point is that without {{text:multiling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721685#comment-16721685
]
Osma Suominen commented on JENA-1652:
-
Are you sure [~code-ferret] that the lang tag h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721645#comment-16721645
]
Code Ferret commented on JENA-1652:
---
I'm looking at the problem now. It's not clear that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721644#comment-16721644
]
Osma Suominen commented on JENA-1652:
-
I can think of many ways of fixing the original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721628#comment-16721628
]
Osma Suominen commented on JENA-1652:
-
It appears to be a difference in Lucene behavio
Osma Suominen created JENA-1652:
---
Summary: jena-text analyzer regression
Key: JENA-1652
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1652
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Bug
Compo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721423#comment-16721423
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1651:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721421#comment-16721421
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1651:
---
Commit 124c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1651.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.10.0
> Improve the TDB internal consistency checkin
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/509
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721422#comment-16721422
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1651:
---
Commit 1c5b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1648.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Andy Seaborne
Fix Version/s: Jena 3.10.0
> Make the re
+1
-Osma
Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 12.12.2018 klo 20.18:
(with deadline)
As per: email:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5762798313a642dc90076e3562c83457571d92758d0d73e6010af0d0@%3Cdev.jena.apache.org%3E
this is a vote to move the code repo from git-wip-us.apache.org to the
gitbox.apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721359#comment-16721359
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1648:
---
Commit f93f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721358#comment-16721358
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1648:
---
Commit d893
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721360#comment-16721360
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1648:
--
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/507
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16721339#comment-16721339
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1651:
--
GitHub user afs opened a pull request:
h
GitHub user afs opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/509
JENA-1651: Specific counter for tracking active transactions.
This only happens occasionally even under high update load and is harmless,
only leading to a spurious log message.
You can merge this pull r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1651:
Description:
{{TransactionManager.checkReplaySafe}} reads two AtomicLongs but updated to
these aren
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1651:
---
Summary: Imprve the TDB internal consistency checkign for safe
replay.
Key: JENA-1651
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651
Project: Apache Jena
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1651:
Summary: Improve the TDB internal consistency checking for safe replay.
(was: Imprve the TDB intern
30 matches
Mail list logo
