FOSDEM 2019 report (brief)

2019-02-05 Thread Claude Warren
I attended FOSDEM and worked the Apache table (as well as attending some talks). We had Jena stickers and they were very popular. When I asked if people knew what it was the general answer was "No, but I like the look of the logo". Ahh well, at least some of the folks I talked to said they would

Re: Another extra module

2019-02-05 Thread Claude Warren
My understanding of Graphana is that they provide charts (aka visual graphs but just to keep the nomenclature clear I will call them charts) for data. They are source agnostic and currently talk to a number of databases. The idea is to allow a user/admin to create queries that would be charted by

[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1663) ModelAssembler does not protect prefix manipulation with a transaction.

2019-02-05 Thread Ashley Sommer (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1663?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16761520#comment-16761520 ] Ashley Sommer commented on JENA-1663: - I'm having the same problem with ja:UnionModel

Re: Another extra module

2019-02-05 Thread ajs6f
This would make Graphana metrics appear as RDF in the Jena API? ajs6f > On Feb 3, 2019, at 2:40 PM, Claude Warren wrote: > > After spending some time at FOSDEM this weekend, i am going to look into > creating a Jena adapter for Graphana. Is this the sort of module we might > consider for inclu

Re: CMS diff: Jena Full Text Search

2019-02-05 Thread ajs6f
I think I left this drop, and I apologize. Vincent, can you resend your patch, but this time without the unnecessary assertions (as pointed out by Andy et al.)? If not, that's okay, I can reassemble it myself from the mailing list. Thanks either way! ajs6f > On Jan 29, 2019, at 4:42 AM, Andy S