[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17018498#comment-17018498
]
xia0c commented on JENA-1819:
-
Hi [~andy], thanks for your help. It could solve my issue. Woul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17018399#comment-17018399
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-1819 at 1/17/20 11:29 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17018399#comment-17018399
]
Andy Seaborne edited comment on JENA-1819 at 1/17/20 11:29 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17018399#comment-17018399
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1819:
-
This is due to JENA-1756.
Apache Commons Lang3
xia0c created JENA-1819:
---
Summary: Updating from 3.12 to 3.13 breaks
Key: JENA-1819
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1819
Project: Apache Jena
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: xia0c
Sounds like nothing to worry about (wrt to my NOTICE question).
ajs6f
> On Jan 17, 2020, at 12:53 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Thanks for the vote.
>
> On 17/01/2020 15:58, ajs6f wrote:
>
>> I did notice:
>>> Portions of this software are from Apache Xerces and were originally based
>>> on t
Thanks for the vote.
On 17/01/2020 15:58, ajs6f wrote:
I did notice:
Portions of this software are from Apache Xerces and were originally based on
the following:
- software copyright (c) 1999, IBM Corporation., http://www.ibm.com.
- software copyright (c) 1999, Sun Microsystems., http:
Philipp Neuschwander created JENA-1818:
--
Summary: Bug: CustomCoordinateSequence::setOrdinate missing break
statements
Key: JENA-1818
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1818
Project:
+1 binding.
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
Yes x 3.
> + can the source archive really be built?
Yes.
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
Looks good.
I did notice:
> Portions of this software are from