kinow opened a new pull request #41:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/41
I'm reading about ASF sites (for another ASF project) and reading the infra
docs they suggest both `hugo` and `website`. Harmless to add it I think?
:man_shrugging:
Actually, I was asking if we has a standard or recommendation one way or
the other.I'll take a look again tomorrow, I didn't have much time to
review. If you need to proceed without my approval, feel free.
Claude
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 10:52 PM Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 17/02/2021
On 17/02/2021 17:37, Claude Warren wrote:
I noticed that the changes to querybuilder converted a bunch of java.util.x
import to java.util.*
This is what PR review is for. It does help to be in-context.
I have updated the PR - can you approve it now please?
I was in the code because I had
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the comments.
We'll investigate further and will update the thread if we get a resolution.
Some responses inline.
Dave
On 17/02/2021 10:29, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Not clear to me exactly what's happening.
Is there any characteristic like increased load around or soon
I am in touch with the Apache spatial group about the 2021 slots, and it
looks like I will dedicate a strand to linked data and geosparql with jena
here in spatial track.
Marco
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 11:43 AM Claude Warren wrote:
> There is a call for tracks for ApacheCon 2021. Do we want
I noticed that the changes to querybuilder converted a bunch of java.util.x
import to java.util.*
I have always heard that the asterisk should not be used in the import
statement as it can cause conflicts that are very hard to debug when new
versions of the specific library are updated and
There is a call for tracks for ApacheCon 2021. Do we want to propose a
track again this year? Perhaps we could get some presentations from users.
FYI: I gave an impromptu talk about Jena at the Apache "table" during
FOSDEM at the beginning of this month.
Claude
--
I like: Like Like - The
Not clear to me exactly what's happening.
Is there any characteristic like increased load around or soon before
the problem arises?
Are the read calls being made from the same machine as the updates?
Martynas's experience suggests a possibility because client code can
eventually interfere
Thanks Martynas. Don't think it quite fits the symptoms, and something
we've tried to be careful of, but worth another look.
Dave
On 16/02/2021 12:55, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Not Fuseki-related per se, but I've experienced something similar when
the HTTP client is running out of
