[GitHub] [jena-site] ieugen commented on pull request #117: Improved backup docs https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1500

ieugen commented on PR #117: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/117#issuecomment-1249539957 > (separately we're discussing changing the publication pipeline to have a branch for future changes; we only have a per-PR staging at the moment). This sounds great. Thanks. p.s

[GitHub] [jena-site] afs commented on pull request #117: Improved backup docs https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1500

afs commented on PR #117: URL: https://github.com/apache/jena-site/pull/117#issuecomment-1249349319 Thanks! Looks good. Because this refers to 4.7.0, it won't get merged to main just yet. (separately we're discussing changing the publication pipeline to have a branch for future

Re: slf4j 2.0.0 - bumpy upgrade path

This commit (to RDF Delta) puts the choice of slf4j 1.7.x vs 2.x in one place: two POM properties in the top POM. https://github.com/afs/rdf-delta/commit/90bbc25435f803c6b2fb77963870e5ede27b4a7f Andy On 09/09/2022 09:49, Andy Seaborne wrote: On 09/09/2022 00:20, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: