[VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-24 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Jena 3.5.0. This is the first proposed candidate for a 3.5.0 release. Note - the deadline is 18:00 UTC on Friday - not midnight - if things go well, I am be able to push bytes out Friday evening and have them sync over night. Release changes Introdu

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
Bruno, Thank you for running these tests. == What to do about the 5.3.0 release TDB2 is marked as experimental and I don't know how else to break the deadlock of not getting used for real except by a release. I've hammered as much as I can. The absence of Data-0001 suggests it is a test se

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread ajs6f
Possible option: change the default Maven profile to skip TDB2 for this 3.5.0 release? We buy ourselves some time (at least until a potential 3.5.1 with a stabilized TDB2 test regime) but we still keep TDB2 as available as possible. I'm quite uncomfortable with releasing with the main profile

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 25/10/17 20:05, aj...@apache.org wrote: Possible option: change the default Maven profile to skip TDB2 for this 3.5.0 release? > We buy ourselves some time (at least until a potential 3.5.1 with a stabilized TDB2 test regime) but we still keep TDB2 as available as possible. Thanks for the

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread ajs6f
I don't understand-- I thought the release is _always and only_ the source-- the artifacts are just a convenience we supply...? ajs6f Andy Seaborne wrote on 10/25/17 9:37 PM: On 25/10/17 20:05, aj...@apache.org wrote: Possible option: change the default Maven profile to skip TDB2 for this 3.

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
e + a comment about a known issue, and proceed with the release. CheersBruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 Bruno, Thank you for running these tests. == What to do about the 5.3.0 release TD

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread ajs6f
n not blocking the release. Perhaps we could simply mark that test with a @Ignore + a comment about a known issue, and proceed with the release. CheersBruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 5:50 AM Subject: Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
AM  Subject: Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 Bruno, Thank you for running these tests. == What to do about the 5.3.0 release TDB2 is marked as experimental and I don't know how else to break the deadlock of not getting used for real except by a release.  I've hammered as much as I can.

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
"always" Yes, the release is the source-release. "only" not as simple. The binary artifacts must correspond to the source-release. The binary artifacts going to maven central are project artifacts, and are exposed as org.apache. It is still important. Only VOTEd material goes to central/org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-24 Thread Andy Seaborne
+1 Please vote to approve this release:   [ ] +1 Approve the release   [ ]  0 Don't care   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... Checking needed: + does everything work on Linux? + does everything work on MS Windows? + does everything work on OS X? + are the GPG signatures fine

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-25 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
__ From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 5:47 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Jena 3.5.0. This is the first proposed candidate for a 3.5.0 release. Note - the deadline is 18:00 UTC on Fri

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-27 Thread Osma Suominen
+1 I've built the RC twice on Ubuntu 16.04: one full build and one using -Pdev. I didn't encounter the build problems others have seen. I'll let others decide whether they are serious enough to warrant another RC. I've done some TDB2 testing, will write about that in a separate message. -Osm

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0

2017-10-27 Thread Andy Seaborne
There isn't sufficient confidence in this release candidate and there quite a few PRs. I'll send out a plan for RC2 soon. These will be the only changes made for RC2 so any checking work done elsewhere isn't invalidated. Osma - thank you for voting. Andy

[VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Jena 3.5.0. This is the second proposed candidate for a 3.5.0 release. Note - the deadline is 18:00 UTC on Thursday - not midnight - so that bytes can be pushed out and sync over night. Release changes Introducing TDB2: http://jena.staging.apache.org

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Osma Suominen
Thanks for preparing the second RC Andy! Excellent work, and very timely, considering that several problems were found with the RC1 build late last week and you got all fixes integrated already! I tried to build RC2 on two different Ubuntu 16.04 machines. They have slightly different Java and

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi Osma, I think you've identified the "group id" gotcha. I can't tell if the elasticsearch test failure is one of it's "usual ones" (it's erratic on Jenkins). More inline: On 30/10/17 12:50, Osma Suominen wrote: Thanks for preparing the second RC Andy! Excellent work, and very timely, cons

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread ajs6f
I got a clean build with Mac OS X, Maven 3.5.0, Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation. However, when checking the sigs, I'm getting: ➜ /tmp gpg --verify apache-jena-3.5.0.tar.gz.asc apache-jena-3.5.0.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon Oct 30 05:47:51 2017 EDT gpg:using

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Osma Suominen
Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 30.10.2017 klo 16:01: Hi Osma, I think you've identified the "group id" gotcha. I did a PR on this (JENA-1411 / PR #300). I can't tell if the elasticsearch test failure is one of it's "usual ones" (it's erratic on Jenkins). I think the ES issue may be due to high lo

Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 30/10/17 14:04, aj...@apache.org wrote: I got a clean build with Mac OS X, Maven 3.5.0, Java version: 1.8.0_65, vendor: Oracle Corporation. However, when checking the sigs, I'm getting: ➜  /tmp gpg --verify apache-jena-3.5.0.tar.gz.asc apache-jena-3.5.0.tar.gz gpg: Signature made Mon Oct

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Andy Seaborne
+1 (tested on Linux) Please vote to approve this release:   [ ] +1 Approve the release   [ ]  0 Don't care   [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... This vote will be open to at least   Thursday, 2017-11-02, 18:00 UTC. If you expect to check the release but the 72 hour limit do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread ajs6f
Yeah, I was somehow missing your key. Weird, I thought I had imported it a long time ago. Oh, well, all good on that front. +1 to the release. ajs6f Andy Seaborne wrote on 10/30/17 10:34 AM: On 30/10/17 14:04, aj...@apache.org wrote: I got a clean build with Mac OS X, Maven 3.5.0, Java ve

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
ndencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? All good. >+ does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? All good. Thanks for preparing the release. Bruno ________ From: Andy Seabo

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-10-30 Thread Osma Suominen
+1 Built on two different Linux machines. I tested RC1 more thoroughly last week (see my e-mail about TDB2 testing) and I think the results are still valid since the changes after RC1 were very small. -Osma Andy Seaborne kirjoitti 30.10.2017 klo 13:20: Hi, Here is a vote on a release of Je

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 (RC2)

2017-11-02 Thread Andy Seaborne
This vote passes with 4 +1's: Andy, Bruno, Osma, Adam Thansk for all the work to improve the testing. I'll push the bytes out and send a [ANN] to users@ soon. Please tweet the link etc etc. All being well, I'll send something out to the general semweb list as well after a few days.

@Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
-10-25T22:46:37+13:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 91M/1478M [INFO] Bruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 5:47 AM Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0 Hi, Here is a vote on a rel

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
e: 05:20 min [INFO] Finished at: 2017-10-25T22:46:37+13:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 91M/1478M [INFO] Bruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 5:47 AM Su

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread ajs6f
: 05:20 min [INFO] Finished at: 2017-10-25T22:46:37+13:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 91M/1478M [INFO] Bruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 25 October 2017 5:47 AM Subject

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
rk, and send a stack trace (didn't see one last night, but was running the test just before calling a day). CheersBruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 6:33 AM Subject: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apac

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread ajs6f
see one last night, but was running the test just before calling a day). CheersBruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 6:33 AM Subject: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] Bruno, The absence of the D

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
ndy Seaborne  To: dev@jena.apache.org  Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 6:33 AM  Subject: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] Bruno, The absence of the Data-0001 is very strange. It is created for every test in the DatabaseMgr.connectDatasetGraph ca

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
;s worth. ________ From: "aj...@apache.org" To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 9:29 AM Subject: Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] > I did notice one warning when running the tests, but

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 25/10/17 22:39, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: ps : mvn clean test install -Pdev would stop in the Jena base I think, complaining it couldn't find the jena-guava-shaded module... but mvn clean install worked. Just for what's worth. Use -Pbootstrap if it is a clean build, or if it tries to pic

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Seaborne
Hi Bruno - sorry you are having hard time of it but it's all very helpful information. Thoughts, so far, inline. On 25/10/17 22:39, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: It could be normal warnings when running tests. And since you noticed it before, I'm fine assuming it's unrelated to the issue we have

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-26 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
hough I'm not sure what to do about the Windows test failures. Ignore them all? CheersBruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Thursday, 26 October 2017 10:49 AM Subject: Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] On 25/1

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-26 Thread Andy Seaborne
ject: Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] On 25/10/17 22:39, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: ps : mvn clean test install -Pdev would stop in the Jena base I think, complaining it couldn't find the jena-guava-shaded module... but mvn clean install worked. J

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-26 Thread Rob Vesse
TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] > > > > On 25/10/17 22:39, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: >> ps : mvn clean test install -Pdev would stop in the Jena base I think, complaining it couldn't find the je

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-26 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
tober 2017 1:34 AM Subject: Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0] Good to know that @Rule/tmpFolder isolation address the problem. It might well be the best long term, but the effect of disk space that has been a problem for TDB1 might arise. On PR#296, I'

Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_prefixes_3 [Was Re: [] Release Apache Jena 3.5.0]

2017-10-26 Thread Andy Seaborne
nd it makes a difference perCoreThreadCount defaults to true which helps cope with different machines. Andy Cheers Bruno From: Andy Seaborne To: dev@jena.apache.org Sent: Friday, 27 October 2017 1:34 AM Subject: Re: @Test TestDatabaseOps.compact_pre