[GitHub] jena issue #289: Version bumps for 3.5

2017-11-04 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/289 I'm closing this PR because for such a small changeset, it's not worth figuring out how my delta gots screwed up with the tabs in the `pom.xml`. I'll just open a fresh PR in a day or three, for JENA-1418

[GitHub] jena issue #289: Version bumps for 3.5

2017-11-04 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/289 I've picked out the Thrift update and done it because it may affect external data. JENA-1417 ---

[GitHub] jena issue #289: Version bumps for 3.5

2017-10-21 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/289 Wait, something has gone wrong here. The only changes I made were to the values of a few properties in that `pom.xml`. I have no idea why it's doing such a giant diff. I need to figure that out. ---

[GitHub] jena issue #289: Version bumps for 3.5

2017-10-21 Thread ajs6f
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/289 Okay, let's let it hang until after the release then. And I'll file a Jira. ---

[GitHub] jena issue #289: Version bumps for 3.5

2017-10-21 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/289 And no JIRA :-) People do look sometimes. ---

[GitHub] jena issue #289: Version bumps for 3.5

2017-10-21 Thread afs
Github user afs commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/289 I don't think we should be updating versions this late in the release cycle unless they fix identified bugs. They don't get tested by SNAPSHOT use. Both the thrift change (not incremental - do we n