Re: Deprecated Classes

Hi, If JMeter will break plugins massively, the biggest problem are rarely changing/abandoned plugins. There's simply nobody to release fixed versions of them. So please consider a pain that this will cause to community. Andrey Pokhilko 22.11.2017 00:44, Philippe Mouawad пишет: > Hi Graham, > As

Re: svn commit: r1815838 - in /jmeter/trunk: src/functions/org/apache/jmeter/functions/ChangeCase.java test/src/org/apache/jmeter/functions/TestChangeCase.java xdocs/changes.xml xdocs/usermanual/funct

Hi Felix, I've taken into account your first remarks. I let you fix the remaining ones. Thanks for your feedback! Regards On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:36 AM, Felix Schumacher < felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > > > Am 20. November 2017 20:50:51 MEZ schrieb pmoua...@apache.org: > >Author:

Re: svn commit: r1815838 - in /jmeter/trunk: src/functions/org/apache/jmeter/functions/ChangeCase.java test/src/org/apache/jmeter/functions/TestChangeCase.java xdocs/changes.xml xdocs/usermanual/funct

Am 20. November 2017 20:50:51 MEZ schrieb pmoua...@apache.org: >Author: pmouawad >Date: Mon Nov 20 19:50:51 2017 >New Revision: 1815838 > >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1815838&view=rev >Log: >Bug 61759 - New __changeCase function >Contributed by Orimarko >Bugzilla Id: 61759 > >Added: >jm

Re: svn commit: r1815838 - in /jmeter/trunk: src/functions/org/apache/jmeter/functions/ChangeCase.java test/src/org/apache/jmeter/functions/TestChangeCase.java xdocs/changes.xml xdocs/usermanual/funct

Am 21. November 2017 22:23:32 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad : >Hi Felix, >In this case CAMEL_CASE implementations are wrong. >Your conception look indeed closer to what I was usually seeing. >Shall I fix it ? I have a few more questions ;) What shall we do with umlauts? If we handle umlauts,

[GitHub] jmeter pull request #336: Fixed some docs regarding removal of WorkBench

GitHub user ham1 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/336 Fixed some docs regarding removal of WorkBench Removed some references to WorkBench from docs. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ham1/

Re: BUG 61567

Hello, There is clearly a bug. You can try the attached project. The fix would be just to rename our jars by suffixing them with version Regards On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 12:22 AM, sebb wrote: > The code is quite complicated, so I would be very wary of changing it. > And it's important not to in

[GitHub] jmeter issue #335: Removed functions.util.* as they don't seem to be used (f...

Github user codecov-io commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/335 # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/jmeter/pull/335?src=pr&el=h1) Report > Merging [#335](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/jmeter/pull/335?src=pr&el=desc) into [trunk](https://codecov.io/gh/

Re: Static Analysis Issues

Hi Graham, My answers below. Regards On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Graham Russell wrote: > It looks to me like the quality gate is already failing? > https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=org.apache.jmeter%3AJMeter > > How do we normally know if we are passing or failing, could it be

Re: Deprecated Classes

Hi Graham, As we'll be releasing a 4.0, we might drop them. This can possibly break plugins but we have warned about this for 2 releases. Regards On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Graham Russell wrote: > I came across the following classes, in org.apache.log, which are > deprecated and the comme

[GitHub] jmeter pull request #335: Removed functions.util.* as they don't seem to be ...

GitHub user ham1 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/335 Removed functions.util.* as they don't seem to be used (for many years). ## Description Remove files which don't seem to be used, they have a TODO comment from 2008 and hasn't been meaningfully cha

Re: svn commit: r1815838 - in /jmeter/trunk: src/functions/org/apache/jmeter/functions/ChangeCase.java test/src/org/apache/jmeter/functions/TestChangeCase.java xdocs/changes.xml xdocs/usermanual/funct

Hi Felix, In this case CAMEL_CASE implementations are wrong. Your conception look indeed closer to what I was usually seeing. Shall I fix it ? Do you think CAMEL_CASE and CAMEL_CASE_FIRST_LOWER are clear enough ? Or should we name them: - UPPER_CAMEL_CASE - LOWER_CAMEL_CASE As per: https:/

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

Work fine in my Linux Antonio 2017-11-21 20:28 GMT+01:00 Milamber : > > > On 21/11/2017 12:36, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> Hello, >> Thanks Antonio for your tests, I indeed was using laf name instead of >> class >> name. >> It is working now in my tests, but Milamber, Antonio or any subscriber,

buildbot success in on jmeter-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder jmeter-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/jmeter-trunk/builds/3244 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave1_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc

buildbot failure in on jmeter-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder jmeter-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/jmeter-trunk/builds/3242 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave1_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sched

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

On 21/11/2017 12:36, Philippe Mouawad wrote: Hello, Thanks Antonio for your tests, I indeed was using laf name instead of class name. It is working now in my tests, but Milamber, Antonio or any subscriber, your tests are welcome. That's works for default LAF after remove theses lines into thi

Jenkins build is back to normal : JMeter Windows #893

See

Build failed in Jenkins: JMeter Windows #892

See Changes: [pmouawad] Fix SONAR warnings [pmouawad] Fix SONAR warnings [pmouawad] Fix order [pmouawad] Bug 61794 - [Influxdb] Allow users to add theirs owns tags Fix SONAR warnings Bugzilla Id: 61794 --

buildbot success in on jmeter-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder jmeter-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/jmeter-trunk/builds/3240 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave1_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc

buildbot failure in on jmeter-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder jmeter-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/jmeter-trunk/builds/3239 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave1_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sched

Re: Bug 61763

Hello, It has been implemented within Bug 61724 Regards On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:55 PM, jmeter tea wrote: > Bug #61763 marked as fixed, > But it has no files attached and I don't find __encode function, > Should it change to Status NEW? > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_activity.cgi?id=6176

Bug 61763

Bug #61763 marked as fixed, But it has no files attached and I don't find __encode function, Should it change to Status NEW? https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_activity.cgi?id=61763

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

Hello, Thanks Antonio for your tests, I indeed was using laf name instead of class name. It is working now in my tests, but Milamber, Antonio or any subscriber, your tests are welcome. Jenkins build is in progress, a new nightly build should be available in few minutes. Regards On Tue, Nov 21, 201

[Jmeter Wiki] Update of "CommittingChanges" by ham1

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jmeter Wiki" for change notification. The "CommittingChanges" page has been changed by ham1: https://wiki.apache.org/jmeter/CommittingChanges?action=diff&rev1=4&rev2=5 * the xdocs/changes.xml file should be updated (exce

Jenkins build is back to normal : JMeter-trunk #6481

See

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

Hi, I have tested with the last release : apache-jmeter-r1815865 It's appear only in the first launch of JMeter. In the second launch, all is ok 2017-11-21 10:17 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad : > Hi Antonio, > I fixed this bug on sunday. > Are you using last revision ? > > Thanks > > On Tue, No

buildbot success in on jmeter-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a restored build on builder jmeter-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/jmeter-trunk/builds/3235 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave1_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sc

Build failed in Jenkins: JMeter-trunk #6480

See Changes: [pmouawad] Add test of callable statement in read mode -- [...truncated 182.61 KB...] [concat] at java.net.Socket.connect(Socket.java:589) ~[?:1.8.0_152]

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

Hi Antonio, I fixed this bug on sunday. Are you using last revision ? Thanks On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > About Darcula, in Windows 10 (I will test it in Linux later but I think > it's the same) we have in the first launch > > 2017-11-21 10

buildbot failure in on jmeter-trunk

The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder jmeter-trunk while building . Full details are available at: https://ci.apache.org/builders/jmeter-trunk/builds/3234 Buildbot URL: https://ci.apache.org/ Buildslave for this Build: bb_slave1_ubuntu Build Reason: The AnyBranchScheduler sched

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

Hi Philippe, About Darcula, in Windows 10 (I will test it in Linux later but I think it's the same) we have in the first launch 2017-11-21 10:09:26,333 INFO o.a.j.g.a.LookAndFeelCommand: Installing Darcula LAF 2017-11-21 10:09:26,363 INFO o.a.j.g.a.LookAndFeelCommand: Using look and feel: Darcula

Build failed in Jenkins: JMeter-trunk #6479

See Changes: [pmouawad] Enable running of JUnit tests from within IntelliJ with default config Contributed by Graham Russell This closes #334 -- [...truncated 181.52 KB...]

Re: Use of https://github.com/HdrHistogram/HdrHistogram

+1 for using HdrHistogram. We found out that the percentiles values shown in "Aggregate Report" and the web dashboard are different for the same JTL file. It will be good if we can use the same logic to calculate percentile values in JMeter listeners and the web dashboard. On Sat, May 20, 2017 at

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

Hi Milamber, One note below regarding LAF. Thanks On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Milamber wrote: > > > On 20/11/2017 21:06, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> Hello, >> We now have a version that contains: >> - 49 enhancements >> - 13 bug fixes >> - 6 PR >> >> Version looks mature to me currently a

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

On 20/11/2017 21:06, Philippe Mouawad wrote: Hello, We now have a version that contains: - 49 enhancements - 13 bug fixes - 6 PR Version looks mature to me currently and brings interesting new features and a nice new look. +1 for nice new look. (perhaps Dracula can be the default look&feel)

Re: Release a 4.0 ?

I found it, sorry for the confusion. On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > Function is there , it is called __digest > > Please confirm you find it. > Regards > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 7:58 AM, jmeter tea wrote: > > > I think it's a g

[GitHub] jmeter issue #332: Added Spock framework and some tests, both old and new

Github user pmouawad commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/332 Hi @ham1 , Thanks for this interesting PR. There is a conflict in it, could you rebase it as you proposed. Also, there is something I don't understand, I see coverage has decreased while

[GitHub] jmeter pull request #334: Enable running of JUnit tests from within IntelliJ...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/334 ---