vlsi commented on pull request #628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/628#issuecomment-713544056
Frankly speaking, I don't know how to display "disabled item" vs "enabled
but located under a disabled item", so let's revert 558 for now.
---
pmouawad commented on pull request #628:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/628#issuecomment-713530070
Hello @vlsi ,
unless you have time to implement your proposal, I would suggest to revert
#558 as you suggested.
Current behaviour is indeed problematic whenever you use some
pmouawad commented on pull request #615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/615#issuecomment-713529253
Thanks for your answer.
I'll close this PR for now.
Thanks
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
pmouawad closed pull request #615:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/615
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to th
vlsi commented on a change in pull request #544:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/544#discussion_r509226219
##
File path:
src/components/src/test/groovy/org/apache/jmeter/visualizers/backend/influxdb/InfluxDBRawBackendListenerClientSpec.groovy
##
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
Hello Felix,
Thanks for your answer.
Yes all pending issues I am aware of have now been fixed.
The two things we need to decide relate to whether we want to merge:
- Autocorrelation in Alpha: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/499
- Raw InfluxDB BackendListener client:
https://github.
vlsi commented on pull request #632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/632#issuecomment-713468232
> if it doesn't break the build when running with Java 8
All the previous CI jobs pass, so it works.
In practice, it is activated only in case `-PenableErrorprone` is added as
Hi Vincent,
what were you trying to tell us, with the picture of that action?
Felix
Am 05.10.20 um 19:28 schrieb Vincent Daburon:
Am 17.10.20 um 15:18 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello,
> I hope you’re all doing well.
>
> I am starting a new thread as the old one related to 5.3.1 seems to keep us
> in a stuck state :) and we are now more in a position for a 5.4.
>
> So, what about releasing a 5.4 ?
My last information was,
FSchumacher commented on pull request #632:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/632#issuecomment-713433154
My biggest concern with this PR at the moment is its size. Could we add the
feature (errorprone) without changing every nag it shows? I tend to get bored
when looking at big PR
10 matches
Mail list logo