Re: Why does LogkitLoggerAdapter implement Serializable?

Fixed by: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1739903=rev On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > The ancestor is Serializable. > Existing implementations for other log frameworks are Serializable so I > would say yes. > > > > Regards > >

Re: Why does LogkitLoggerAdapter implement Serializable?

Hi Sebb, The ancestor is Serializable. Existing implementations for other log frameworks are Serializable so I would say yes. Regards On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:58 AM, sebb wrote: > PING - I think we need to resolve this before the re-release > > On 2 April 2016 at 13:59,

Re: Why does LogkitLoggerAdapter implement Serializable?

PING - I think we need to resolve this before the re-release On 2 April 2016 at 13:59, sebb wrote: > Anyone? > > Code was added by Philippe as part of Bugzilla Id: 59240 > > > On 1 April 2016 at 00:29, sebb wrote: >> Is there any need to serialise this class?

Re: Why does LogkitLoggerAdapter implement Serializable?

Anyone? Code was added by Philippe as part of Bugzilla Id: 59240 On 1 April 2016 at 00:29, sebb wrote: > Is there any need to serialise this class? > > If not, it should not implement the interface. > If so, it needs a dummy ctor to allow unit tests to work