Cleanup and followup tasks regarding graduation

i asked infa to perform the steps necessary for graduation: https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/agent/INFRA/issue/INFRA-11758 Pls. note that the git location and mailinglist names will change soon. Also the website will move. -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D

Re: [ANN] Apache Johnzon as new TLP

i'll take care of the next steps ... On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Don't forget to do the requisite clean up work. Johnzon still shows as a > podling http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html > Please graduate them in podlings.xml. > > I sent out an email the ot

new committer: Reinhard Sandtner

The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache Johnzon (incubating) has asked Reinhard Sandtner to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Welcome Reinhard, great to have you on board. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project sinc

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

The voting is now closed. It has passed with 8 +1 votes and no 0 or -1 votes. The breakdown of the votes, in the order in which they were received under the two categories, is as follows. +1 (binding) Daniel Kulp Romain Manni-Bucau Mark Struberg Justin Mclean Hendrik Saly +1 Sergey Beryozkin Karl

[RESULT] [VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

Karl Grosse Reinhard Sandtner I would like to thank everyone who voted and looking forward to the project being graduated soon. Regards, Hendrik Saly On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > Dear Community, > > Based on the positive discussion, I'm calling for the commu

[VOTE] Graduate Johnzon from the Incubator

Dear Community, Based on the positive discussion, I'm calling for the community VOTE to graduate Apache Johnzon (incubating) to top level project (TLP). Please vote on the resolution pasted below. [ ] +1 Graduate Apache Johnzon from the Incubator. [ ] +0 Don't care. [ ] -1 Don't graduate Apache

Re: Graduation from the incubator

I don’t need to be on the committer list, I’m not sure I’ve contributed > anything. > > Other than that, +1 to graduation. > > Dan > >> On Mar 27, 2016, at 7:12 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote: >> >> Vot

Re: CI Status (Travis + Jenkins)

also coveralls fixed https://coveralls.io/github/salyh/incubator-johnzon (currently 73% test coverage) On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Awesome, Thks! > Le 28 mars 2016 22:57, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit : > >> Green again for travis and jenkin

CI Status (Travis + Jenkins)

Green again for travis and jenkins (jdk 6+7+8) https://travis-ci.org/salyh/incubator-johnzon/builds/119074851 https://builds.apache.org/job/johnzon/528/ https://builds.apache.org/job/johnzon-multi/4/ -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: Incubating site branding issue

resolved D and I (but not L, its not a *MUST* a we have our own logo) https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/commit/90d17f0bb3be4715d1d9e739a0bc1b7d26dcfb1a On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> we started to discuss the graduation - and think we just miss a vote A

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

see http://markmail.org/message/i2djfzk5lozpguwx On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > +1 too > > will try to update MATURITY.adoc and > http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html this weekend > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:

Re: Graduation from the incubator

sensus on who will be the new PMC chair. I'd like to nominate Romain or Mark Anything missing? On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I can do that. > > Will put the things together in a proposal (by today). > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Justin

Re: Graduation from the incubator

I can do that. Will put the things together in a proposal (by today). On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 1:28 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > So in order to graduate we need to: > - Put together a graduation resolution. > - Work out who will be on the new PMC. > - Have consensus on who will be the new P

Re: discrepance between java7 and java8

same question goes for jsonp 1.1 work, currently its in a separate branch but i think we should align this with the choosen approach for jsonb. On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2016-03-18 14:03 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg : >> hi folks! >> >> Currently our main delivery is

Re: support of plain values?

s that needed for jsr-374 (jsonp 1.1) only or also for jsr-353 (jsonp 1.0) currenty johnzon jsonp 1.1 impl is here https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/tree/jsr374_367 On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > answering to myself, jsonp 1.1 got readValue() instead of read

Re: Missing board report

up, wrong thread, pls ignore last mail On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > is that needed for jsr-374 (jsonp 1.1) only or also for jsr-353 (jsonp 1.0) > currenty johnzon jsonp 1.1 impl is here > https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/tree/jsr374_367 > > On T

Re: Missing board report

is that needed for jsr-374 (jsonp 1.1) only or also for jsr-353 (jsonp 1.0) currenty johnzon jsonp 1.1 impl is here https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/tree/jsr374_367 On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Ok John, thanks. Guess we all assumed a reminder would arriv

Re: nan handling

what does jsr-367 say about NaN? On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 5:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 0./0 serialized value (openjmh does it in some - not good - cases) so you > get "NaN" as a double value in the json. > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog >

Re: svn commit: r12470 - in /release/incubator/johnzon: ./ johnzon-0.9.3-incubating/

+1 On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> I suggest we go for TLP and be done? > > +1 I think you probably get the award for the incubating project with the > most releases. If you not ready now you’ll never be :-) > > Justin -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @h

Report proposal April 2016

Since we missed the last report (sorry, very busy at the moment with $ work) here is the proposal for next month Johnzon Implementation of JSR-353 JavaTM API for JSON Processing. Johnzon has been incubating since 2014-06-09. Three most important issues to address in the mov

Re: [VOTE] Graduation for Apache Johnzon

+1 too will try to update MATURITY.adoc and http://incubator.apache.org/projects/johnzon.html this weekend On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > oh, beside the minor orga cleanup +1 for graduation of course! > > LieGrue, > strub > >> Am 10.03.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Mark Struber

Re: new release?

can help too, but unsure what the next steps are On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi > >> Hmm, that's true. Wanted to add the release to tomee M3 (planned next >> week). Sounds a bit hard to do then. > > We can do both. > >> Anyone able to help with the graduation process?

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.3-incubating release

+1 On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Karl Grosse wrote: > +1 from me > > ty > > 2016-02-17 10:47 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > >> Hi >> >> As mentioned on the list here is the release vote for johnzon 0.9.3: >> >> he release is >> * >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzo

Re: prettification

ssing in the 1st impl I >> did. If not an issue in your impl - or if the jvm fixed this drawback - I >> see no reason to not merge it :). >> >> Thks a lot to have taken this issue! >> Le 13 oct. 2015 07:47, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit : >> >>> fixed on

Re: prettification

fixed on separate branch https://github.com/apache/incubator-johnzon/commit/f1392c2f02b0aeba2b41aed19e3b8625005ea9a1 i took the chance and rewrote the generator, it was too complex imho can someone review and merge this into master if ok? On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote: >

Re: prettification

s.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-10-12 10:18 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Dev : > >> i can look into this but cannot reprodu

Re: prettification

i can look into this but cannot reproduce @Test public void prettySimple() { final ByteArrayOutputStream baos = new ByteArrayOutputStream(); final JsonGenerator generator = Json.createGeneratorFactory(new HashMap() {{ put(JsonGenerator.PRETTY_PRINTING, true);

Re: [DISCUSS] Johnzon Graduation

here is my formal +1 (do we need a separate VOTE? Direction seems pretty clear) On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Karl Grosse wrote: > +1 > Am 06.10.2015 02:43 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : > >> +1 from me >> -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

[DISCUSS] Johnzon Graduation

Hi all, i'd like to start the "official" discussion about graduation of Johnzon. Personally i think we are ready and we should start as soon as possible a VOTE here on the dev list about it. I also like to suggest that we become a top level project. I also volunteer to drive the graduation proce

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.2-incubating release

+1 but in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/johnzon/ the .md5 and .sha1 files are missing (which are present in the nexus repo) On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:45 PM, Karl Grosse wrote: > +1 > > Kind regards > > Karli > > 2015-09-30 21:33 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > >> Hi >> >> As m

Re: release.next

i am on conference tour whole next week, so i cannot drive this On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > anyone willing to drive a new release? If not I'd plan to do one probably > next week. > > wdyt? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] [lazy consensus] Apache Johnzon Logo

finally the files are here https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12754642/Apache%20Johnzon%20Logo%20final.zip On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1, well done! > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 04.09.2015 um 21:43 schrieb Hendrik Dev : >

[RESULT] [VOTE] [lazy consensus] Apache Johnzon Logo

VOTE passed so Johnzon does now have a logo: http://people.apache.org/~salyh/aj_logo_vote.png Will post high res and vector versions of the logo soon KR Hendrik On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I'd like to start up a vote for the new Johnzon Logo. > The propo

Re: Report Proposal (Sept. 2015)

I agree with Justin and i tend into the same direction as Romain (own TLP). My idea was to await ApacheCon to see if we can attract a few more people there to join the project. But i'am also open to start the discussion right now. KR Hendrik On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau w

Re: Report Proposal (Sept. 2015)

lt;https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-08-23 2:23 GMT-07:00 Hendrik Dev : > >> Here is the proposal for the September Report. Comments and feedback >> welcome. >> >> >> J

[VOTE] [lazy consensus] Apache Johnzon Logo

I'd like to start up a vote for the new Johnzon Logo. The proposed Logo is attached and can also be found here http://people.apache.org/~salyh/aj_logo_vote.png If no one objects within five days, I'll assume lazy consensus. Other proposal could be found here https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/J

Report Proposal (Sept. 2015)

Here is the proposal for the September Report. Comments and feedback welcome. Johnzon Implementation of JSR-353 JavaTM API for JSON Processing. Johnzon has been incubating since 2014-06-09. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. Expandi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9.1-incubating release

+1 On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > oops, Hendrik just mentionned I used CA29F018 key to sign the release which > is true, the key is in the KEYS file as well so no need to cancel the vote > :) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau

Re: changing description for git

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-10178 On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi > > anyone knows how to change the git description we have on: > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=summary > > > It still mentions Fleece. > > Romain

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release (RC-2/2nd vote)

Vote passed with 3 +1 binding votes and no -1 votes. On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I've created a second 0.9-incubating release candidate, with the following > artifacts up for a project vote: > > Git commit for the release is > https://git-wip-us.ap

Call for Johnzon Logo

Hi, maybe its a good time to think about a logo for Johnzon. I prepared two sketches to start the discussion: https://goo.gl/photos/XUedGqQ4FRaw9X3AA A good friend of mine is a graphic designer and can, if we have a final decision, create a high resolution clean copy of the winner logo. So plea

Re: [jira] [Closed] (JOHNZON-51) jaxrs provider shouldnt use wildcard

set fixed version to 0.9.5-incubating, set status to resolved On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > > Romain Manni-Bucau closed JOHNZ

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release (RC-2/2nd vote)

I've created a second 0.9-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=ab542d7208c2b60aa6fdab1b11fa01a1e9ad8241 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apac

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release

vote canceled due to relying on a snapshot dependency Will start a new vote soon ... On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 6:35 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I've created a 0.9-incubating release candidate, with the following > artifacts up for a project vote: > > Git commit for the release is

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release

created an issue for that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRELEASE-917 On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > Its a test dependency only, so maybe its not really a problem (are the > tests part of the release?). > I guess thats also the reason why the maven relea

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release

w.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-08-08 17:33 GMT-07:00 Daniel Cunha : > >> +1 >> >> On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Hendrik Dev >> wrote: >> >> > I've created a 0.9-incubating

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.9-incubating release

I've created a 0.9-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=8003dc109740e70f0bb88e1eae331afc11f35c88 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/

Re: jaxrs and exception handling

+1 for the simple solution (but it isn't it a very rare case that a exception has a self reference to it as root root cause?) On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi > > how should we handle exceptions having themself as root cause? > > Simple solution is to detect the loo

Re: JSR 374 (and 367)

; > Any reason api has no impl yet? >> > >> > Personnally i try to make the body greppable to make it easy to check >> > before any release (throw new UnsupportedOperationException("jsr xxx to >> > impl")) >> > >> > Wdyt? >>

JSR 374 (and 367)

I have started with preparations for making Johnzon ready for upcoming JSR 374 (Jsonp 1.1) and JSR 367 (Json Binding). Pls see https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-json_1.1_spec/ and https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=01b412b8 -

Re: Johnzon talk at ApacheCon 2015

@Justin: great :-) On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> My talk submission has been accepted, so there will be a presentation >> about Apache Johnzon in Budapest. > > Congratulations! I’ll see you there as I had several talks accepted :-) > > Thanks, > Justin -- He

Johnzon talk at ApacheCon 2015

FYI My talk submission has been accepted, so there will be a presentation about Apache Johnzon in Budapest. -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.8-incubating release

Vote passed with 4 +1 binding votes, one +1 non binding vote and no -1 vote. On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I've created a 0.8-incubating release candidate, with the following > artifacts up for a project vote: > > Git commit for the release is

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.8-incubating release

I've created a 0.8-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=bb26c1e8c87d7e71f7b7f6917397ed91d0866ff7 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/

Incubator Status Report Proposal

Here ist the proposal for the june status report. Any comments or feedback welcome. Johnzon Implementation of JSR-353 JavaTM API for JSON Processing. Johnzon has been incubating since 2014-06-09. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. E

Re: Serializable classes in Johnzon core (impl)

twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-04-22 0:17 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Dev : > >>

Re: Few thoughts and questions on javax.json.spi.JsonProvider (geronimo spec)

ok, but just wondering why the RI does threadlocal caching if its not working within containers On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:06 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2015-04-22 0:01 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Dev : > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >>

Serializable classes in Johnzon core (impl)

I propose to remove "implements Serializable" from all of the implementation classes in Johnzon core (impl). For most classes it makes no sense to be Serializable and maybe its not spec compliant (not sure about this). See attached diff. If its not violating the spec maybe the JsonArrayImpl and Js

Re: Few thoughts and questions on javax.json.spi.JsonProvider (geronimo spec)

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le 21 avr. 2015 22:51, "Hendrik Dev" a écrit : >> >> A few thoughts and questions on >> >> JsonProvider.doLoadProvider(): >> - "tccl" can be null (in case of system classloader) but

Few thoughts and questions on javax.json.spi.JsonProvider (geronimo spec)

A few thoughts and questions on JsonProvider.doLoadProvider(): - "tccl" can be null (in case of system classloader) but thats never really checked - special handling org.apache.geronimo.osgi.locator.ProviderLocator really needed here? JsonProvider.provider(): - doPrivileged/SecurityManager check

Config consistency

Had a chat with romain in irc (see below) about the config consistency. Here are my comments: The two warnings are correct, org.apache.johnzon.default-char-buffer and org.apache.johnzon.max-string-length are not supported by the Generator. For org.apache.johnzon.default-char-buffer it should be

Re: Websocket module tests fails on Java 6

and avoids having a > build hard to use for newcomers like relying on toolchain > Le 7 avr. 2015 13:22, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > >> Do we have something in commons which has similar functionality and we can >> copy over? >> >> LieGrue, >> stru

Apache Karaf Decanter project is using Johnzon

FYI https://github.com/apache/karaf-decanter/commit/9a68a08063ffa3f01d00ebf35244ef59b342d0a9 -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: Websocket module tests fails on Java 6

jcache > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomi

Websocket module tests fails on Java 6

For JSR 353 compliance we have to support Java 6 (at least for the core package) :-( java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: java/nio/charset/StandardCharsets at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:217) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at java.net.URLClassLoader

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.7-incubating release

this vote passes with 5 +1 votes (4 of them binding) and no -1 vote On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I've created a 0.7-incubating release candidate, with the following > artifacts up for a project vote: > > Git commit for the release is > https://git-wip

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.7-incubating release

Guys, pls. vote On Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > Was at a conference the whole week and just came back yesterday. Need until > tomorrow to do a proper review. > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 23.03.2015 um 16:15 schrieb Hendr

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.7-incubating release

//rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> > > 2015-03-23 16:15 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev : > >> I've created a 0.7-incubating release c

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.7-incubating release

I've created a 0.7-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=97930e2a8447c330115263afc83c094d48b163c8 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/

Re: Changes in Numbers Json implemetations

Hi Daniel, thanks for the patch. We have an unofficial benchmark suite which can be found here: https://github.com/salyh/jsr353-benchmark It would be great if you could benchmark your patch against current master to make sure that there are no perf implications. Thanks Hendrik On Fri, Mar 13,

Johnzon March report proposal

I propose to report: Johnzon Implementation of JSR-353 JavaTM API for JSON Processing. Johnzon has been incubating since 2014-06-09. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. Expanding the community, increase dev list activity and adding n

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.6-incubating release

so we have 3 binding +1 votes and one non-binding +1 vote no -1 votes, so this vote pass i ll send out the vote to @incubator Thanks Hendrik On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I've created a 0.6-incubating release candidate, with the following > artifacts up fo

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.6-incubating release

I've created a 0.6-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=dda975b327211277fc96c4155b6e98bc54a4a7d9 Maven staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/

Re: support of Class?

+0, IMHO very special but why not BTW: What about multidimensional arrays/array of arrays? Do we already support this/do we need this? On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys, > > Do we want to support Class getX()? > > Personally I'm +-0. It mainly means enhancing

Re: Johnzon Feature List

he current release https://coveralls.io/r/salyh/incubator-johnzon for current master Hope this helps KR Hendrik On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Prem Sangeeth wrote: > Hi Hendrik Dev, > > Can you share the test coverage report. Or help out to setup local > run to get the coverage

Johnzon Feature List

I think we need a list of features and configuration options to include this in our documentation. I started with that with the following outcome: Core: - Full JSR 353 compatible, but not yet certified - Speed is comparable to Jackson and the reference implementation. In general we are a little b

Benchmark Suite

I composed a JMH based benchmark suite to benchmark Johnzon with Jackson, Genson, Glassfish JSR353 RI and GSON. https://github.com/salyh/jsr353-benchmark/tree/generalbenchmarksuite Current results are not bad but some areas need optimizations. Pls. see https://github.com/salyh/jsr353-benchmark/t

Re: De/Serialization byte[]

lass support as well but it is really a global (all class fields) > option you want no? > > why not? > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-01-12 21:54 GMT+

Re: De/Serialization byte[]

http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-01-12 21:38 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev : >> dont know if i got it. my idea was to have a global switch >> (treatByteArrayAsBase64) and then you can override this global switc

Re: De/Serialization byte[]

http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-01-12 21:12 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev : >> see >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=92098f4561c80a569c8349d8132369dcfa998e08 >> >> Its not

Re: Interested in contributing.

applied, thanks a lot as i cannot close the pull request pls. close it On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > Hi Prem, > > thank you for your interest and your contribution. > I will look into this now. > > -Hendrik > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:52 PM

Re: De/Serialization byte[]

www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2015-01-12 13:17 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev : >> do we want to serialize a byte array into a sequence of int's (eg >> [2,5,0,9, ...]) or as a base64 encoded string? or we make it >> conf

Re: Interested in contributing.

Hi Prem, thank you for your interest and your contribution. I will look into this now. -Hendrik On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Prem Sangeeth wrote: > Hi All, > > I am very much interested in studying and contributing to apache > johnzon. I have started studying the code and features. > > I ha

De/Serialization byte[]

do we want to serialize a byte array into a sequence of int's (eg [2,5,0,9, ...]) or as a base64 encoded string? or we make it configurable and define a default? -- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.5-incubating release

NOTICE fine in src and in the binaries I've checked > * signature fine > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > >> On Monday, 5 January 2015, 11:19, Hendrik Dev wrote: >> > I've created a 0.5-incubating release candidate, with the following >> artifacts

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.5-incubating release

Mentors/PPMC members, we really need an additional binding +1 vote here. Thanks Hendrik On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi! > > Will try to check it today. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >> On Monday, 5 January 2015, 11:19, Hend

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.5-incubating release

I've created a 0.5-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is [a88f797] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=a88f79789c0ca288217d90d509633b566c0ac692 Maven staging repo: https://repository.a

December report proposal

Here is the Johnzon report proposal for December: Johnzon Implementation of JSR-353 JavaTM API for JSON Processing Johnzon has been incubating since 2014-06-09. Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: 1. Expanding the community, increase de

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating

Hi All, this vote passed with: Three +1 binding votes from Justin Mclean, Mark Struberg and Romain Manni-Bucau. There were no 0 or -1 votes. Thanks Kind regards Hendrik On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > Hi all, > > Please vote on releasing the following candidate

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the general discussion (if necessary) into another thread. Is that feasible ? Thanks Hendrik

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

about the vote/release. The vote already pass for the incubator on the project level because we had three +1 votes from incubator PMC members. Thanks Hendrik On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I've created a 0.2-incubating release candidate, with the following > artifac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

ok, so this vote passed finally :-) We also have already three +1 votes from incubator PMC members. So the question is: a) just inform Incubator about it and release or b) give them (like we did it before) 72h to look into it and release if we got no -1 Thanks Hendrik On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 10:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

If i count correct we are still missing another +1 from a PPMC member. So far we have two from Mark and Romain. Justin voted +0 and Thiago and myself are not PPMC (=Johnzon PMC) Right? On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Hendrik Dev wrote: > I'd like to continue with this RC/VOTE since

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

I'd like to continue with this RC/VOTE since its IMHO really a minor issue On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > It's fixed for the next incubating release that good enough IMO. > >> Guess it is ok since we are not yet 1.0 > > Either that (I didn't vote -1 and even if I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

thanks justin for this. i fixed the disclaimer in master. should we cancel the vote and prepare a new release candidate or do we want to proceed with the vote/release? Thanks Hendrik On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +0 binding because DISCLAIMER issue. It's minor

[VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release

I've created a 0.2-incubating release candidate, with the following artifacts up for a project vote: Git commit for the release is [56c9789] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa Maven staging repo: https://repository.a

Re: release after fixing the API?

.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-11-12 15:52 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev : >> i can prepare the release tomorrow evening if we are ready ... >> >> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau >> wrote: >>> add

Re: release after fixing the API?

i can prepare the release tomorrow evening if we are ready ... On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > added field access support + private constructor support. > > For me we can release, wdyt? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmanni

Re: assigning issues

Not normal I also cannot assign issues to you On Tuesday, November 11, 2014, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi guys > > I can't assign issues to myself on jira, is it normal? An issue in the > initial setup? > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wo

Re: support private/protected constructors?

+1 what about superclasses? On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > PS: suppose we should think about fields as well > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau > http://www.tomitribe.com > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com > https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > 2014-11-10 19:26

  1   2   >