+1
Tommaso
Il giorno sab 19 nov 2016 alle ore 06:15 Henry Saputra <
henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> HI All,
>
> I think we have bit too many branches in our source repo.
>
> Would it be easier to keep the branches to just master and releases
> branches?
>
>
>
> - Henry
>
Sorry I was late on dev@ list for this Vote, Lewis
Looks like I have to -1 for this one:
Missing DISCLAIMER file for the source release artifact
NOTICE.txt file contains Apache HTrace instead of Apache Joshua
Minor issue:
Extra file "pom.xml.release.releaseBackup"
- Henry
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 a
HI All,
I think we have bit too many branches in our source repo.
Would it be easier to keep the branches to just master and releases
branches?
- Henry
+1
Cheers,
Dave
> On 14 Nov 2016, at 17:16, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
>
> [ ] +1, let's get it released!!!
> [ ] +/-0, fine, but consider to fix few issues before...
> [ ] -1, nope, because... (and please explain why)
+1 from me Lewis SIGS and CHECKSUMS look good:
LMC-053601:apache-joshua-6.1-incubating-rc1 mattmann$
/Users/mattmann/bin/stage_apache_rc joshua 6.1-src
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/joshua/
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Hello general@incubator,
Please VOTE on the Apache Joshua 6.1 Release Candidate #1. The release VOTE
has passed over on user@ and dev@joshua with the following results
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40joshua.incubator.apache.org/msg01884.html.
We solved 44 issues: https://s.apache.org/joshua6.1
Lewis,
Thanks for heading this up. Is it okay to use the latest master for the 6.1
release? Or would that require a new vote?
I think I'm done making changes in the near term, now that the language packs
are out.
matt
> On Nov 18, 2016, at 5:09 PM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
I will try and VOTE today sorry for the delay great job Lewis.
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Principal Data Scientist, Engineering Administrative Office (3010)
Manager, Open Source Projects Formulation and Development Office (8212)
NASA Je
Hi Team,
OK so I am going to bring this VOTE to a close... 72 hours has come and
gone.
The VOTE's are in and are as follows
[8] +1, let's get it released!!!
Lewis John McGibbney**
Paul M. Ramirez**
Matt Post*
John Hewitt*
Tommaso Teofili**
Thamme Gowda*
Kellen Sunderland*
Felix Hieber*
[0] +/-0,
+1
Thamme
On Nov 15, 2016 6:18 AM, "Felix Hieber" wrote:
> +1
>
> Felix
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 10:55 AM Tommaso Teofili <
> tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Tommaso
> >
> > Il giorno lun 14 nov 2016 alle ore 19:16 John Hewitt <
> > john...@seas.upenn.edu>
> > ha scritto
Ah, thanks, Thamme! The first question was whether this was the right choice
(it seems it was), and now I can go spend some time fixing this in Eclipse.
matt
> On Nov 18, 2016, at 3:43 PM, Thamme Gowda wrote:
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> In the recent days, package-info.java is preferred over package.ht
Hi Matt,
In the recent days, package-info.java is preferred over package.html.
I may have read the official word from Oracle sometime ago:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/tools/solaris/javadoc.html#packagecomment
I guess the issue you're facing is due to multiple info files for t
Hi folks,
I am in the process of publishing the release of 62 language packs, constructed
by my colleague here at the Johns Hopkins HLTCOE, Paul McNamee.
I am updating this page as they come out:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JOSHUA/Language+Packs
Inevitably problems will
13 matches
Mail list logo
