Hi,
The latest checkout failed the *'ant test*' on running *test/testIO.rb *on
line 150, but when I run *test/testIO.rb*
manually it ran perfectly fine.
the problem line has the following code:
test_ok(File.delete(@file1,@file2,@file3))
I haven't figure out what's wrong, my initial guess will b
Hmm... ok, I think I must have seen a change from Rails 1.2.5 here and
gotten confused. In MRI it was stepping into ActiveRecord, but that was
because it was Rails 1.2.3. Looks like it's working. Awesome!
--Chris
On 10/22/07, Peter Brant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Looks like that's actuall
Looks like that's actually the right thing to do. rdebug with MRI
does the same thing. It's heading off into the Rails' implementation
of Class#const_missing looking for Car.
JRuby rdebug log attached.
Pete
On 10/23/07, Chris Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doh! I should have updated jrub
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException - Exception in thread "Ruby
Thread24338914"
Key: JRUBY-1464
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1464
Project: JRuby
Doh! I should have updated jruby-trunk before I did that, my bad. Yes,
that was with the latest code in jruby-debug trunk. Just right now I was
debugging a very simple restful controller list method. It fails
consistently for me trying to step into Car.find(:all) -- it ends up
stepping into dep
Cool. So was this with the latest and greatest (r315)? With the
latest threading fixes, basic stepping (in / over) should work
reasonably well. That it doesn't means we have more work to do, of
course. Are there situations where it consistently fails?
Pete
P.S. Recent revisions of trunk use a
Alrighty, I was able to test debugging rails inside of NetBeans and it
(mostly) worked! Yay! Thanks to Peter's latest patches I was able to step
inside of a controller (sometimes). So we're definitely moving along.
One small suggestion: can we change the require 'ruby_debug.so' to require
'ruby
On 10/22/07, MenTaLguY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> Last night I took a stab at implementing BasicObject; rewiring the
> class bootstrap to include BasicObject took me about five minutes,
> but I got stuck on how the method definitions themselves should be
> handled. As far as I can
Matt Fletcher wrote:
Ola,
I'm using JRuby for a commercial, closed-source application, so I'm
sensitive to the licenses of JRuby and the libraries it is dependent
on. So far, so good...nothing terribly restrictive like GPL is
required so far.
I don't know exactly what REJ is, but from some
Ola,
I'm using JRuby for a commercial, closed-source application, so I'm
sensitive to the licenses of JRuby and the libraries it is dependent on. So
far, so good...nothing terribly restrictive like GPL is required so far.
I don't know exactly what REJ is, but from some quick searches it looks lik
Hi guys,
Last night I took a stab at implementing BasicObject; rewiring the
class bootstrap to include BasicObject took me about five minutes,
but I got stuck on how the method definitions themselves should be
handled. As far as I can tell, there are two options:
1. separate RubyObject into Rub
This ticket http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1460 is the only
remaining problem with the JRuby mongrel port.
Anyone have any thoughts?
Thanks for all the assistance so far.
Evan
On 10/18/07, Evan Weaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, couple of things.
>
> Errno::ECONNABORTED doesn't exis
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ola Bini wrote:
Not really. All gains would disappear from that, including heightened
compatibility in most String methods. I don't think that's a good
approach.
Ahh, because of the byte[]/char[] thing. Makes sense.
- Charlie
Yes, but also all the mbc stuff that
Ola Bini wrote:
Not really. All gains would disappear from that, including heightened
compatibility in most String methods. I don't think that's a good approach.
Ahh, because of the byte[]/char[] thing. Makes sense.
- Charlie
---
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ola Bini wrote:
Hi
During the last days I've revived my REJ port of the MRI regular
expression engine and integrated with trunk. The result is available
in the jruby-reg branch. I'm mailing this out now, because at this
point the engine runs the full JRuby test s
Ola Bini wrote:
Hi
During the last days I've revived my REJ port of the MRI regular
expression engine and integrated with trunk. The result is available in
the jruby-reg branch. I'm mailing this out now, because at this point
the engine runs the full JRuby test suite - plus several tests that
Java deserialization through java-integration is broken in JRuby
Key: JRUBY-1463
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1463
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Compon
Hi
During the last days I've revived my REJ port of the MRI regular
expression engine and integrated with trunk. The result is available in
the jruby-reg branch. I'm mailing this out now, because at this point
the engine runs the full JRuby test suite - plus several tests that
JRuby trunk doe
18 matches
Mail list logo
