I didn't realize that the current Ant system was so troublesome for people.
Personally, I don't think being self-hosted has much real benefit
especially since the JVM will remain as a dependency :).
Any reason plain old 'make' couldn't be used?
Evan
On 10/23/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PR
Evan Weaver wrote:
Not to step out of my place, but I saw the tickets and patch for the
Rake build system ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1449 ) and
don't understand the benefit of the additional complexity.
What do other people think?
If it's *more* complicated than building with Ant,
Not to step out of my place, but I saw the tickets and patch for the
Rake build system ( http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1449 ) and
don't understand the benefit of the additional complexity.
What do other people think?
Evan
--
Evan Weaver
Cloudburst, LLC
-
Well we have a decent working patch to autoconvert BigDecimal to/from
the Java/Ruby types when calling Java APIs that accept or return Java's
BigDecimal.
Are there any objections to applying it?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-939
- Charlie
-
On 10/23/07, Eric Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>How did you get tasks named "safe:clean", etc?
namespace :foo do
task :bar do
...
end
end
--
Alexey Verkhovsky
CruiseControl.rb [http://cruisecontrolrb.thoughtworks.com]
RubyWorks [http://rubyworks.thoughtworks.com]
---
blocks with var args does not work the same as MRI or JRuby 1.0.1 when the
argument supplied is an array
Key: JRUBY-1468
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/
Eric Armstrong wrote:
Gad. If I hadn't gone to add some additional info
to my bug report, I would never have know that Ola
commented on it. The default setting for a bug I've
filed is "don't watch". I don't know why that would
be--it's not like I saw any option at the time I filed
the bug.
Is th
Gad. If I hadn't gone to add some additional info
to my bug report, I would never have know that Ola
commented on it. The default setting for a bug I've
filed is "don't watch". I don't know why that would
be--it's not like I saw any option at the time I filed
the bug.
Is there a profile setting t
This sounds really terrific. A basic Rake question:
How did you get tasks named "safe:clean", etc?
Is ":" a legal character in a name, and you've done
some really clever naming, or is there some sort of
implied hierarchy?
Travis Tilley (JIRA) wrote:
rake-based build system for JRuby
The first pass is complete. Here's where we stand:
JRuby 1.0.2: 54 scheduled
JRuby 1.1: 147 scheduled
JRuby 1.x: 7 scheduled
71 unscheduled
Many of the open bugs including most of the unscheduled bugs, are
awaiting followup from submitters. They'll likely get punted if there's
no followup, so
DB Connection Leak using rails-integration in Resin
---
Key: JRUBY-1467
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1467
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: ActiveRecord-JDBC, G
Object methods defined in Kernel should not be module methods too
-
Key: JRUBY-1466
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1466
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Ve
Test failures under Windows
---
Key: JRUBY-1465
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-1465
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: JRuby 1.1.0
Environment: trunk (4678), WinXp, Java 1.6
I've been getting the same failure (until a new one cropped up today). JIRA
filed (JRUBY-1465).
-Bill
It fails there too. My off the cuff guess is that we're not always
creating a debugger frame when we should and the debugger ends up
thinking it's in the same frame. I'll take a look after work.
Pete
On 10/23/07, Martin Krauskopf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I suppose you are trying everythin
Chris Nelson wrote:
Peter,
The problem, it turns out, is not with stepping into it's with stepping
over. When trying to step over the Car.find line the debugger ends up
going into dependencies.rb, when it should go to the next line into the
controller. It works correctly in MRI, and I'm (no
Peter,
The problem, it turns out, is not with stepping into it's with stepping
over. When trying to step over the Car.find line the debugger ends up going
into dependencies.rb, when it should go to the next line into the
controller. It works correctly in MRI, and I'm (now) at Rails 1.2.5 in
both
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Quite. I'm looking at it now.
I haven't found anything obvious. In both stack and heap-based compiled
methods, self is a simple ALOAD. It shouldn't perform any differently
than an arbitrary reference.
- Charlie
--
18 matches
Mail list logo
