Thomas E Enebo wrote:
This makes me wonder if we cannot actually ascertain the cost of
various locking/volatile/active/inactive scenarios. Of course in a
pet micro bench of these it may give an unrealistic answer, but it
would still be cool to get some understanding of cost.
Yeah, we need to
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> wrote:
>> Subramanya Sastry wrote:
>>>
>>> I may have been wrong. I had a chance to think through this a little bit
>>> more.
>>>
>>> Consider this ruby code:
>>>
>>> i = 5
>>> v1 =
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:47 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> Subramanya Sastry wrote:
>>
>> I may have been wrong. I had a chance to think through this a little bit
>> more.
>>
>> Consider this ruby code:
>>
>> i = 5
>> v1 = i + 1
>> some_random_method_call()
>> v2 = i + 1
>>
>> In this code
