Oh, I see. It was some *.jar files from ~/Library/Java/Extensions (on
the Mac OS X). Now I have to figure out which one the culprit is. *sigh*
On Jul 29, 2009, at 8:35 PM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
Yes. It runs for me (and IRubyObject is our most commonly used class,
so it being missing is stra
Yes. It runs for me (and IRubyObject is our most commonly used class,
so it being missing is strange). I am guessing you have something
strange going on in your environment. ant clean first may fix
something. Or you can make sure you do not have a CLASSPATH set to
some older version of JRuby s
Try changing:
Java.ruby_to_java(Java::custom.ServicesHome.class)
to:
Java::custom.ServicesHome.java_class
...though it strikes me that we should really work if we do:
Java::custom.ServicesHome
Hmmm, may need to look into that,
-Tom
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Mikael
Lammentausta wrote
require 'socket'
server = TCPServer.new("0.0.0.0", 8080)
puts server.object_id
Ruby 1.9 produces (for example) 16070920
JRuby 1.3RC2 produces (for example) 6
Is this result correct?
The problem exists in http://github.com/oldmoe/reactor/tree/master
This reactor code runs OK with ruby
Is it supposed to pass completely?
http://gist.github.com/158439
-
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
Rescued exception in include_package still sets $!
--
Key: JRUBY-3840
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3840
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core Classes/Modules
I am using JRuby to act as EJB client.
The attached test case describes the problem I have:
http://pastie.org/563934
In essence, after opening the context, I have a problem getting the proper
type cast on the object I receive by RMI. For that, to my understanding, I
would need to call PortableRem
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:46 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
> Nice, then we should just get started.
> Merging the stdlib is one part of it, of course.
Anyone that wants to dive in can go for it. In many cases it will just
be removing the 1.9 compat version from bound methods, since they're
the same behavior
adapter for MaxDB
-
Key: JRUBY-3839
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3839
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: ActiveRecord-JDBC
Environment: Codehaus SONAR
Reporter: Ste
Vladimir Sizikov wrote:
Hi Tom,
My only open question about moving at this point is rubyspec? Does it
include 1.8.7 tests?
Yes, it does. The majority of 1.8.6 specs apply too, plus there are
guards for 1.8.7 specific behavior.
So, 1.8.7 should be covered pretty good.
Thanks,
--Vla
Hi Tom,
> My only open question about moving at this point is rubyspec? Does it
> include 1.8.7 tests?
Yes, it does. The majority of 1.8.6 specs apply too, plus there are
guards for 1.8.7 specific behavior.
So, 1.8.7 should be covered pretty good.
Thanks,
--Vladimir
-
11 matches
Mail list logo