Re: [jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-27 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: Good find! I think technically we're supposed to build the set of frames at the point of "raise", but I haven't been able to clean up/refactor things to that end yet. This is good for now. Applying shortly. Er, I meant the original raise...so yeah, this is closer t

Re: [jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-27 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Good find! I think technically we're supposed to build the set of frames at the point of "raise", but I haven't been able to clean up/refactor things to that end yet. This is good for now. Applying shortly. Peter Brant wrote: I'd like to see this one get in too: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse

Re: [jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-27 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
Looks like Ola managed to take care of this one. Thanks for the patch! Joseph Athman wrote: I'd like to lobby for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3111. It's actually a problem in jvyamlb but it makes JRuby inconsistent with MRI. I attached a patch that I think works, at least all the te

Re: [jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-26 Thread Uwe Kubosch
Hi all! Our project would REALLY benefit from getting these two issues fixed: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3100 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3172 Both have workarounds, but the workarounds introduce other problems. Uwe On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 08:26 -0600, Charles Oliver Nutte

Re: [jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-26 Thread Peter Brant
I'd like to see this one get in too: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3181 Another annoying one if it affects you. Pete On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're looking at JRuby 1.1.6 middle of next week. The major changes: > > * 1.9 support

Re: [jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-26 Thread Joseph Athman
I'd like to lobby for http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-3111. It's actually a problem in jvyamlb but it makes JRuby inconsistent with MRI. I attached a patch that I think works, at least all the tests pass. This bug ends up effecting NetBeans ability to parse certain YAML files which is kind

[jruby-dev] JRuby 1.1.6 on or around Dec 3

2008-11-26 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
We're looking at JRuby 1.1.6 middle of next week. The major changes: * 1.9 support in the parser; only interpreted mode at the moment * Many 1.9 API additions * feof blocking fix a number of you have reported * A leak of WeakReferences for IO FileDescriptors, filling up a ConcurrentHashMap and e