I spent the night working on some experiments.
1. AbstractRubyStruct and AtomicStruct
RubyStruct is an interesting data structure, since it has a fixed size
declared when you define a new Struct. This makes it possible for us
to implement more efficient access, among other things.
More interesti
The post is published! Thanks for your input!
http://blog.jruby.org/2011/12/getting_started_with_jruby_and_java_7/
- Charlie
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:39 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:02 PM, Hirotsugu Asari
> wrote:
>> Ah. You are right about this. I must have
Chuck Remes created JRUBY-6285:
--
Summary: JRuby 1.7 master on Java7u2 is *slower* running a
benchmark than master on Java6
Key: JRUBY-6285
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-6285
Project: JRuby
Ben Browning created JRUBY-6286:
---
Summary: jnr-posix WindowsHelpers.isBatch Always Returns False
Key: JRUBY-6286
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-6286
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
bauagonzo created JRUBY-6287:
Summary: DateTime.to_time method is missing
Key: JRUBY-6287
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-6287
Project: JRuby
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Sta
Garrett Motzner created JRUBY-6288:
--
Summary: 'incompatible character encodings: ASCII-8BIT and UTF-8'
error thrown by jruby but not by ruby
Key: JRUBY-6288
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-6288
I have been wondering if we shouldn't just bump up the default -Xmx
max heap size we allow in the JRuby executable. I know the JVM has a
tendency to want to grow the heap, but few things are as frustrating
as having some long-running process hit the heap max and die.
Thoughts? Concerns?
- Charlie
Hiro Asari created JRUBY-6289:
-
Summary: [1.9] when yield is called with a splat arg, the block
gets the argument as a single Array
Key: JRUBY-6289
URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JRUBY-6289
Project
Yeah,
I think bumping up default -Xmx would be good. Almost every Rails app I
have worked needed to bump up the default -Xmx manually. Please make it
happen :D
--
Best,
Anil
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> I have been wondering if we shouldn't just bump up the de
I love the idea of an increase. What did you have in mind for a new value?
I've rewritten this email a dozen times now trying to suggest a good
default and can't convince myself of any ideal value. All my actual JRuby
apps use many-many GB of heap, which is why they're JRuby apps ... and I
don't fe
I was thinking of bumping to 1GB.
A 32-bit JVM can't go higher than a 4GB process space, and typically
you don't go above 2GB heap there in case there's a lot of native
memory that might push it close to the 32-bit process limit. So I
think we'd be safest halving that and doing 1GB, which would be
11 matches
Mail list logo
