Re: [PR] Resolve minimatch version conflict in wro4j-maven-plugin dependencies. (jspwiki)

2023-06-16 Thread via GitHub
arturobernalg commented on code in PR #285: URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/285#discussion_r1232686468 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -722,6 +722,12 @@ org.mockito mockito-core ${mockito.version} + Review Comment: mmm

Re: [PR] Resolve minimatch version conflict in wro4j-maven-plugin dependencies. (jspwiki)

2023-06-16 Thread via GitHub
arturobernalg commented on code in PR #285: URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/285#discussion_r1232686468 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -722,6 +722,12 @@ org.mockito mockito-core ${mockito.version} + Review Comment: mmm

Re: [PR] Resolve minimatch version conflict in wro4j-maven-plugin dependencies. (jspwiki)

2023-06-15 Thread via GitHub
juanpablo-santos commented on code in PR #285: URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/285#discussion_r1231608214 ## pom.xml: ## @@ -722,6 +722,12 @@ org.mockito mockito-core ${mockito.version} + Review Comment:

[PR] Resolve minimatch version conflict in wro4j-maven-plugin dependencies. (jspwiki)

2023-06-10 Thread via GitHub
arturobernalg opened a new pull request, #285: URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/285 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe,

[GitHub] [jspwiki] juanpablo-santos merged pull request #22: Bump wro4j-maven-plugin from 1.8.0 to 1.10.1

2021-01-01 Thread GitBox
juanpablo-santos merged pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/22 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to g

[GitHub] [jspwiki] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #22: Bump wro4j-maven-plugin from 1.8.0 to 1.10.1

2020-12-28 Thread GitBox
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #22: URL: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki/pull/22 Bumps [wro4j-maven-plugin](https://github.com/wro4j/wro4j) from 1.8.0 to 1.10.1. Release notes Sourced from https://github.com/wro4j/wro4j/releases";>wro4j-maven-plugin

Re: wro4j

2013-08-08 Thread Glen Mazza
x27;t do any compression.) But if wro4j provides other benefits, it's OK with me. However, the roughly 30-45 second delay every time we do an mvn test -Dtest= just to have the JS and CSS get re-compressed and re-linted from scratch is very irritating/draining (and was happening even before

Re: wro4j

2013-08-08 Thread Ichiro Furusato
Hi, I don't have the time right now to dig into what you guys are proposing with wro4j so I can only add a cautionary tale to the table. I imagine that the vast majority of JSPWiki users (i.e., installers) will be modifying the PlainVanilla theme to create a style that matches their indiv

Re: wro4j

2013-08-08 Thread Glen Mazza
On 08/07/2013 05:47 AM, Dirk Frederickx wrote: One of the main advantages for using wro4j at RUNTIME, is that the wro4j filter also GZIP's the JS and CSS files. This has an enormous impact on the size of these files, and we should definitely consider to add this to JSPWiki in the f

Re: wro4j

2013-08-07 Thread Dirk Frederickx
Glen, >>inline feedback On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Glen Mazza wrote: > Hi Dirk, some comments and a question: > > > On 08/04/2013 05:49 PM, Dirk Frederickx wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I recently added WRO4J to the build chain of JSPWIKI. (see >

Re: wro4j

2013-08-07 Thread Dirk Frederickx
gt; It would be nice to have an option to skip this wro4j step when running > (individual) mvn tests, cause the wro4j step takes quite a bit of time. > > kind regards, > Harry > > > > On 4 August 2013 23:49, Dirk Frederickx wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: wro4j

2013-08-07 Thread Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez
Hi, I'm +1 on this. We're beginning to use wro4j at work for some simple cases, only compression and minification, and I'd be interested in seeing some more complex use cases :-) thx, juan pablo p.d.: @Glen, unless I'm mistaken, we're currently using wro4j at build-tim

Re: wro4j

2013-08-06 Thread Glen Mazza
Hi Dirk, some comments and a question: On 08/04/2013 05:49 PM, Dirk Frederickx wrote: Hi all, I recently added WRO4J to the build chain of JSPWIKI. (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-761 for more details) The main goal is the introduction of a proper build system for the JS

Re: wro4j

2013-08-04 Thread Harry Metske
+0.5 I have very little knowledge/experience with js and css. I trust what you say is the right thing to do. It would be nice to have an option to skip this wro4j step when running (individual) mvn tests, cause the wro4j step takes quite a bit of time. kind regards, Harry On 4 August 2013 23

wro4j

2013-08-04 Thread Dirk Frederickx
Hi all, I recently added WRO4J to the build chain of JSPWIKI. (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-761 for more details) The main goal is the introduction of a proper build system for the JS and CSS files, allowing to move away from the current monolithic JS and CSS files, and

[jira] [Resolved] (JSPWIKI-761) Use wro4j to build/minimize javascript and css

2013-08-02 Thread brushed (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] brushed resolved JSPWIKI-761. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.10 Implemented in 2.10.0-svn-27 > Use wr

[jira] [Commented] (JSPWIKI-761) Use wro4j to build/minimize javascript and css

2013-08-02 Thread brushed (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPWIKI-761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13727901#comment-13727901 ] brushed commented on JSPWIKI-761: - Implementing the WRO4J ( Web Resource Optimizer