Our voting policy for *releases *is below, however I'm not clear if there's another voting policy for other project wide issues. Does anyone remember or have documented any other voting policies for this project?
This vote will be open for the next 72 hours per the release policy, which is: - the vote will be closed as soon as 6 hours have past and >7 +1 votes are received with no -1 vote being cast, or - if after 12h >5 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or - if after 24h if 3 +1 votes have been cast with no -1 vote, or failing that - after 72h provided at least 3 +1 votes have been cast and there is a majority of +1 votes from the cast votes. On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 8:36 AM Steve Viens <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (resend) > > On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 2:42 AM Kurt Stam <kurt.s...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 from me >> >> —Kurt >> >> On Dec 22, 2022, at 01:00, Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> Resending...2 votes is not enough to pass, otherwise the board may have >> to take action directly >> >> On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 12:52 PM Steve Viens <svi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 from me as well. >>> >>> Steve >>> >>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 7:28 PM Alex O'Ree <alexo...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> After some discussion over the past month or so, there seems to be >>>> enough of a consensus to hold a vote on retiring Apache jUDDI. I've pretty >>>> much been the only maintainer for a while now and unfortunately have a >>>> number of outstanding issues that I can't solve without assistance from the >>>> community. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately, most, if not all, of the committers and other community >>>> members have moved on to other projects. Usage of the UDDI specification >>>> and Apache jUDDI has never really been that high in general. Recently over >>>> the fast few years, JIRA issue reporting, mailing list traffic and all >>>> known out of band traffic have been near zero. Download statistics are >>>> pretty minimal as well and if anyone is using our libraries, there's little >>>> recent evidence to support that via mvnreponsitory.com's cross >>>> reference capabilities. >>>> >>>> The process for moving a project to the Attic is outlined here: >>>> https://attic.apache.org/process.html >>>> >>>> On Nov 11th, an email was dispatched to both the user and dev lists >>>> about this with no replies. It's time for the formal vote. >>>> >>>> +1 from me >>>> >>> >>>> -- >>> Steve Viens >>> svi...@gmail.com >>> 603-828-2397 >>> >> -- > Steve Viens > svi...@gmail.com > 603-828-2397 >
