[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3973) Investigate feasibility of caching bytes vs. records

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391229#comment-15391229 ] Bill Bejeck commented on KAFKA-3973: The results for the LRU investigation are below. There were three

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-3973) Investigate feasibility of caching bytes vs. records

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bill Bejeck updated KAFKA-3973: --- Attachment: MemoryLRUCache.java CachingPerformanceBenchmarks.java Benchmark test and

Re: Changing hash algorithm to LogCleaner offset map

Thanks Shikhar. I have created KAFKA-3987 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3987). Could anybody please assign that issue to me? I could not do it. I have a patch ready and will open a pull request tomorrow. Regards On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Shikhar Bhushan

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-3987) Allow configuration of the hash algorithm used by the LogCleaner's offset map

Luciano Afranllie created KAFKA-3987: Summary: Allow configuration of the hash algorithm used by the LogCleaner's offset map Key: KAFKA-3987 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3987

[GitHub] kafka pull request #1659: MINOR: cleanup apache license in python files

GitHub user granders opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1659 MINOR: cleanup apache license in python files @ijuma As discussed in https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1645, this patch removes an extraneous line from several __init__.py files, and a few

Re: Changing hash algorithm to LogCleaner offset map

Got it, makes sense to make the hash function customizable if there are environments in which md5 usage is prevented. The approach you are proposing sounds good to me. On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 14:56 Luciano Afranllie wrote: > Nothing wrong about using MD5 for that from

Re: I had a problem of kerberos，I try to solve for a long time can not be resolved。Please help me！

Hi, >From the entry "ERROR SASL authentication failed using login context 'Client'." It seems your ZK cluster is guarded by SASL authentication mechanism, but your brokers which are talking to ZK are not "authenticated". Guozhang On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:06 PM, 無名 wrote: >

Can you add me to the contributors?

Hi awesome Kafka developers, I want to contribute to Kafka, starting with fixing a bug. As per the contribution guidelines, I should be added to contributors to be able to assign a bug to myself. Can you please add me to contributors?  Also, I’ve looked at issues labeled as “newbie” and

I had a problem of kerberos??I try to solve for a long time can not be resolved??Please help me??

HI, My Frends: Sorry,Just send pictures don't show.I change to text. I come from China?? I had a problem, I try to solve for a long time can not be resolved. I also found to a similar article, but did not answer.

[jira] [Commented] (KAFKA-3689) Exception when attempting to decrease connection count for address with no connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15391058#comment-15391058 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on KAFKA-3689: --- GitHub user rnpridgeon opened a pull request:

[GitHub] kafka pull request #1658: Kafka 3689 - process only distinct connectionIds w...

GitHub user rnpridgeon opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/1658 Kafka 3689 - process only distinct connectionIds within processDisconnected() @ijuma discovered a possible scenario in which connectionQuotas may be