Re: [VOTE] 2.5.0 RC0

Thanks David! Note that support for Scala 2.11 was removed, not deprecated. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, 7:47 PM David Arthur wrote: > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, > > This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.5.0. > > This is a major release of Kafka which

[VOTE] 2.5.0 RC0

Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers, This is the first candidate for release of Apache Kafka 2.5.0. This is a major release of Kafka which includes many new features, improvements, and bug fixes including: * TLS 1.3 support (1.2 is now the default) * Co-groups for Kafka Streams

Jenkins build is back to normal : kafka-trunk-jdk11 #1201

See

Build failed in Jenkins: kafka-2.5-jdk8 #49

See Changes: [mumrah] MINOR: Modify release.py prompt to only accept y/n -- [...truncated 2.90 MB...] org.apache.kafka.streams.TopologyTestDriverTest >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-569: DescribeConfigsResponse - Update the schema to include datatype of the field

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 14:00, Shailesh Panwar wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:04 AM Colin McCabe wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, at 11:37, Shailesh Panwar wrote: > > > Thanks Colin for the inputs. Regarding > > > > > > > I think most users of the DescribeConfigs API do not want to get

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-9625) Broker throttles are incorrectly marked as sensitive configurations

Colin McCabe created KAFKA-9625: --- Summary: Broker throttles are incorrectly marked as sensitive configurations Key: KAFKA-9625 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9625 Project: Kafka

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-9623) Streams will attempt to commit during shutdown if rebalance is in progress

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guozhang Wang resolved KAFKA-9623. -- Fix Version/s: 2.6.0 Resolution: Fixed > Streams will attempt to commit during shutdown

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-569: DescribeConfigsResponse - Update the schema to include datatype of the field

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:04 AM Colin McCabe wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, at 11:37, Shailesh Panwar wrote: > > Thanks Colin for the inputs. Regarding > > > > > I think most users of the DescribeConfigs API do not want to get help > text > > > or configuration schema information. > > There is

Re: [KAFKA-557] Add emit on change support for Kafka Streams

Hi all, Just some updates. Below is the vote thread: https://sematext.com/opensee/m/Kafka/uyzND1h1NPW1tLVQR?subj=+VOTE+KIP+557+Add+emit+on+change+support+for+Kafka+Streams It would be great if we can include this change to Kafka. :) Cheers, Richard On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:45 PM Richard Yu

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-9620) Task revocation failure could introduce remaining unclean tasks

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guozhang Wang resolved KAFKA-9620. -- Fix Version/s: 2.6.0 Resolution: Fixed > Task revocation failure could introduce

Re: JIRA permissions request

Thanks, Jun! I've successfully assigned the ticket to myself. On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 1:30 PM Jun Rao wrote: > Hi, Aneel, > > Thanks for your interest in Kafka. Just gave you the jira permission. > > Jun > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:41 AM Aneel Nazareth wrote: > > > Hi. I've created this

Re: JIRA permissions request

Hi, Aneel, Thanks for your interest in Kafka. Just gave you the jira permission. Jun On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 7:41 AM Aneel Nazareth wrote: > Hi. I've created this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9612 to > capture the work if we decide to do KIP-574 ( > >

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-569: DescribeConfigsResponse - Update the schema to include datatype of the field

On Thu, Feb 27, 2020, at 11:37, Shailesh Panwar wrote: > Thanks Colin for the inputs. Regarding > > > I think most users of the DescribeConfigs API do not want to get help text > > or configuration schema information. > There is already a precedence of including this information as part of >

[jira] [Created] (KAFKA-9624) test_throttled_reassignment as EndToEndTest

Matthew Wong created KAFKA-9624: --- Summary: test_throttled_reassignment as EndToEndTest Key: KAFKA-9624 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9624 Project: Kafka Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-9399) Flaky Test BranchedMultiLevelRepartitionConnectedTopologyTest.testTopologyBuild

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guozhang Wang resolved KAFKA-9399. -- Resolution: Fixed > Flaky Test >

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-9606) Document Metrics Changes from KIP-444

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Guozhang Wang resolved KAFKA-9606. -- Resolution: Fixed > Document Metrics Changes from KIP-444 >

[jira] [Resolved] (KAFKA-8963) Benchmark and optimize incremental fetch session handler

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Lucas Bradstreet resolved KAFKA-8963. - Fix Version/s: 2.5.0 Resolution: Fixed > Benchmark and optimize incremental fetch

JIRA permissions request

Hi. I've created this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-9612 to capture the work if we decide to do KIP-574 ( https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-574%3A+CLI+Dynamic+Configuration+with+file+input ). The contributing page says: "To avoid conflicts, assign the JIRA ticket

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-565: Using AclCommand,avoid call the global method loadcache in SimpleAclAuthorizer

Hi Steven, Since we are deprecating ZooKeeper options in AclCommand due to KIP-500 in favour of using bootstrap servers, it is not clear why we need this change. Can you explain why you want to use ZK rather than the secure `--bootstrap-server` option for updating ACLs? Since brokers always have

Re: Fix of System tests on JDK11

Hello, Kafka team. PR [1] seems to be ready for merge. If fixes system tests that start earlier versions of Kafka with JDK11 [1] I got LGTM from Guozhang and Ron Dagostino Can someone, please, make a final review? [1] https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/8138 > 21 февр. 2020 г., в 16:30,

Help me see the new improve for KIP-565 , thanks very much

Thanks for your email thread replay, this switch same not the best.I have changed another way to solve this problom,can you help me review the pr: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/7706/files the email thread url is