Hi Artem,
Thanks for the update.
LGTM.
Luke
On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 6:51 AM Artem Livshits
wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback. I've updated the KIP to elaborate on the
> motivation and provide some background on producer ids and how we measure
> them.
>
> Also, after some thinking and
Thank you for your feedback. I've updated the KIP to elaborate on the
motivation and provide some background on producer ids and how we measure
them.
Also, after some thinking and discussing it offline with some folks, I
think that we don't really need partitioner level metrics. We can use
My first reaction also is that the proposed configuration is surely too
complicated.
It seems like an ideal solution from a usability perspective (always a good
place to start) would be if the consumer just automatically behaved in this
way. To make that work:
1. auto.offset.reset=latest would
Hi Dev Team,
Just want to inform you here that we made an update to this KIP. To
implement emit final in Session Window aggregation, we augment the
`SessionStore` by adding an
public API to range query from earliest session end time to latest session
end time. API is like this:
```
public
Howdy!
It seems like `requestDequeueTimeNanos` is ignored when handling an
envelope request, which could lead to `requestDequeueTimeNanos` ending with
"-1", so that the metric,`LocalTimeMs` is not correct.
I created an issue related to this together with a tiny PR.
issue:
bbejeck commented on PR #406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/406#issuecomment-1170082018
Hi @StephanZimmermann if you can rebase this PR we'll get this merged.
Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
bbejeck commented on PR #320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/320#issuecomment-1170078043
Thanks @JaviOverflow for the contribution!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
bbejeck commented on PR #320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/320#issuecomment-117005
merged #320 into asf-site
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
bbejeck merged PR #320:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/320
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
bbejeck commented on PR #413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/413#issuecomment-1170063176
merged #413 into asf-site
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
bbejeck merged PR #413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/413
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Thanks Chris! I have updated the KIP to include this fix.
I will keep the array as a potential improvement at the moment, and out of
the scope of this KIP.
Thanks,
Jorge.
On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 23:19, Chris Egerton wrote:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> Apologies for the long delay, had my own KIP-related
Thanks for the KIP.
I read it and I am also worried by the complexity of the new
configurations. They are not easy to grasp. I need to digest it a bit more,
I think.
Best,
David
Le mer. 29 juin 2022 à 02:25, Matthias J. Sax a écrit :
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> I don't think I fully digested
ZachLC commented on PR #413:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/413#issuecomment-1169764733
> HI @ZachLC can you rebase this PR and we can get this merged?
Hi @bbejeck,
Sure. thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
Hi Artem,
Could you elaborate more in the motivation section?
I'm interested to know what kind of scenarios this metric can benefit for.
What could it bring to us when a topic partition has 100 ProducerIdCount VS
another topic partition has 10 ProducerIdCount?
Thank you.
Luke
On Wed, Jun 29,
d-t-w commented on PR #372:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/372#issuecomment-1169631953
Thanks @bbejeck much appreciated :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
16 matches
Mail list logo
