[DISCUSS] KIP-561: Regex Expressions Support for ConsumerGroupCommand

Hello, guys, Please review Regex Expressions Support for ConsumerGroupCommand improvement proposal - *Previous Discussion 1*: Re: Multiple Consumer Group Management - *Previous Discussion 2*: Re: ConsumerGroupCommand tool

Re: ConsumerGroupCommand tool accepting more than one group.

Hello Ana, Glad you also like this feature. It has already been implemented by me and merged into trunk. Not yet released though. Best Regs, Alexander Dunayevsky On Tue, 14 May 2019, 23:35 Ana Czarnitzki, wrote: > Hello, > > I wanted to ask if it would be possible to query for more than one gr

KAFKA-7471: Multiple Consumer Group Management PR merging with trunk

Hello guys, Any comments/updates on Multiple Consumer Group Management PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5726 ? Best Regards, Alex Dunayevsky

Re: [DISCUSS] Kafka 2.2.0 in February 2018

KIP-379? On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, 22:33 Matthias J. Sax Just a quick update on the release. > > > We have 22 KIP atm: > > 81, 207, 258, 289, 313, 328, 331, 339, 341, 351, 359, 361, 367, 368, > 371, 376, 377, 380, 386, 393, 394, 414 > > Let me know if I missed any KIP that is targeted for 2.2 release.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Vahid Hashemian

Congrats, Vahid! On Wed, 16 Jan 2019, 05:54 Gwen Shapira Congrats, Vahid. Thank you for all your contribution! > > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019, 2:45 PM Jason Gustafson > > Hi All, > > > > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Vahid Hashemian as a project > > committer and > > we are > > pleased to annou

Re: [VOTE] KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management

ity feels that > > it's > > > not > > > an issue I believe it's a team decision after all :). > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 at 15:06, Gwen Shapira wrote: > &g

[VOTE] KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management

Hello guys, We need your VOTES for the KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management. KIP-379: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-379%3A+Multiple+Consumer+Group+Management PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5726/ Let's start the voting session. Thank you, Alex Dunayevsk

[DISCUSS] KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management

't have a strong >opinion. >#3. To clarify, my suggestion was to put the group id first. I think Vahid >was in agreement. From your comment, it sounds like you agree as well? >#4. I agree supporting regex can be left for future work. > >Thanks, >Jason > >On Mon,

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management

't have a strong >opinion. >#3. To clarify, my suggestion was to put the group id first. I think Vahid >was in agreement. From your comment, it sounds like you agree as well? >#4. I agree supporting regex can be left for future work. > >Thanks, >Jason > >On Mon, Nov 5, 2018

Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management

ed, so will we continue to support >>> the >>>> old format? Also, if only one `--group` option is passed, do you think >>> it's >>>> worth leaving it the group column out of the `--describe` output? That >>>> would keep the describe outp

[DISCUSS] KIP-379: Multiple Consumer Group Management

Hello, friends! Welcome to the Multiple Consumer Group Management feature for kafka-consumer-groups utility discussion thread. KIP is available here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-379%3A+Multiple+Consumer+Group+Management Pull Request: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull