+1 non-binding
Thanks Colin
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:21 AM Dhruvil Shah wrote:
>
> This is exciting! +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Dhruvil
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 12:29 PM Bill Bejeck wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Bill
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:26 PM
+1 (non-binding), thanks Guozhang
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 1:14 AM Boyang Chen wrote:
>
> Hey Guozhang,
>
> LGTM, +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 5:07 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
>
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > I've created a new KIP allowing consumer.committed to take a set of
> > partitions
Hi,
I have created a KIP to allow listing groups per state:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-518%3A+Allow+listing+consumer+groups+per+state
Have a look and let me know what you think.
Thank you
+1 (non binding)
Thanks Jason
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:15 AM David Jacot wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP!
>
> Best,
> David
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:55 PM Jason Gustafson wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-352, which is a follow-up to KIP-455
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 3:05 PM Ron Dagostino wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks, Rajini.
>
> Ron
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 10:16 AM Harsha Chintalapani
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:53
> > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > I've read it through in depth and as Jungtaek said Spark can make
> > good
> > > > use
> > > > > of it.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, 17:06 Jungtaek Lim,
+1 (non binding)
Thanks!
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:53 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019, at 11:47, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > Hey Colin, I think deleting all offsets is equivalent to deleting the
> > group, which can be done with the `deleteConsumerGroups` api. I debated
> >
Hi Rajini,
Thanks for the KIP!
I really like that authorize() will be able to take a batch of
requests, this will speed up many implementations!
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:57 PM Rajini Sivaram wrote:
>
> Thanks David! I have fixed the typo.
>
> Also made a couple of changes to make the context
+1 non binding
Thank you!
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:07 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the simple but very useful KIP!
> Best,
> Stanislav
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 8:32 PM Harsha Chintalapani wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> >
> >
Hi Guozhang,
Thanks for taking a look.
1. Right, I updated the titles of the code blocks
2. Yes that's a good idea. I've updated the KIP
Thank you
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:05 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> Thanks for raising these 2 valid points. I've upd
ot specified in the map? If so, we should specify that in the JavaDoc.
> >
> > isolationLevel seems like it should be an enum rather than a string. The
> > existing enum is in org.apache.kafka.common.requests, so we should probably
> > create a new one which is public in org.apache.kafka.clients.ad
; >> > > > > of some of the partitions and the policy maker was interested in
> >> > > > precisely
> >> > > > > which partitions would be changed, and how, they would indeed
> >> have to
> >> > > > > compute that for
_uncommitted?
>
> 5. I don't feel too strongly about it, but other admin APIs have tended to
> use "alter" for updates (e.g. `alterConfigs` and `alterReplicaLogDirs`).
> You might consider `alterConsumerGroupOffsets` over
> `resetConsumerGroupOffsets`.
>
> -
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 9:36 AM Andrew Schofield
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On 09/08/2019, 08:39, "Sönke Liebau" wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 04:45, Harsha Chintalapani wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding). much needed!!
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8768:
-
Summary: Replace DeleteRecords request/response with automated
protocol
Key: KAFKA-8768
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8768
Project: Kafka
Thank Colin for kickstarting this initiative.
Just one question.
- A nice feature of Zookeeper is the ability to use chroots and have
several Kafka clusters use the same Zookeeper ensemble. Is this
something we should keep?
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 7:44 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> On Mon,
r. For example, `NonEmptyGroupException` or something like that.
>
> -Jason
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:33 AM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Colin,
> >
> > Thank you for taking a look!
> > I agree, being able to set consumer group offsets via t
; be odd to have a way to delete consumer offsets in AdminClient, but not to
> create them. What do you think?
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, at 09:27, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > In an attempt to unblock this KIP, I've made some adjustmen
details to the motivation section.
So we have +5 non binding votes and 0 binding votes
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:10 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Bumping this thread once again
>
> Ismael, have I answered your questions?
> While this has received a few non-binding +1s, no committe
t these defaults should
> be.
>
> Thanks again for reading my KIP,
> Justine
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 4:19 AM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Justine,
> >
> > Thanks for the response!
> > In my opinion, it would be better if the producer
reateTopics request.
> (Technically it can--but the topic will already be created through the
> broker, so it will never try to create the topic.)
> It is possible to change this however, and I'd be happy to discuss the
> benefits of this alternative.
>
> Thank you,
> Justine
>
t;
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, at 09:14, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > Colin,
> >
> > The javadocs links are broken:
> > The requested URL /23/javadoc/index.html was not found on this server.
> >
> > It's the 3rd time in a row this happens (2.1 and 2.2 had the same
Hi Justine,
Thanks for the KIP!
In case auto creation is enabled on both the client and server, will
the producer still use the AdminClient (CreateTopics request) to
create topics? and not rely on the broker auto create.
I'm guessing the answer is yes but can you make it explicit.
Thank you
On
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 2:23 AM David Arthur wrote:
>
> +1 binding, looks like a nice improvement. Thanks!
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:17 PM Justine Olshan wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I wanted to let you all know the KIP has been updated.
; Norwood, David Arthur, Dejan Stojadinović, Dhruvil Shah, Doroszlai,
> > Attila, Ewen Cheslack-Postava, Fangbin Sun, Filipe Agapito, Florian
> > Hussonnois, Gardner Vickers, Guozhang Wang, Gwen Shapira, Hai-Dang Dam,
> > highluck, huxi, huxihx, Ismael Juma, Ivan Yurchenko, Jarr
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8600:
-
Summary: Replace DescribeDelegationToken request/response with
automated protocol
Key: KAFKA-8600
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8600
Project
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8598:
-
Summary: Replace RenewDelegationToken request/response with
automated protocol
Key: KAFKA-8598
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8598
Project: Kafka
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8599:
-
Summary: Replace ExpireDelegationToken request/response with
automated protocol
Key: KAFKA-8599
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8599
Project
Thanks Colin for making a new RC for KAFKA-8564.
+1 (non binding)
I checked signatures and ran quickstart on the 2.12 binary
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:03 AM Gwen Shapira wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
> Verified signatures, verified good build on jenkins, built from
> sources anyway and ran quickstart
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8564:
-
Summary: NullPointerException when loading logs at startup
Key: KAFKA-8564
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8564
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8474:
-
Summary: Improve configuration layout on website
Key: KAFKA-8474
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8474
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
Thank you Vahid
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 5:12 PM Wladimir Schmidt wrote:
>
> Thanks Vahid!
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, 16:23 Vahid Hashemian wrote:
>
> > The Apache Kafka community is pleased to announce the release for Apache
> > Kafka 2.2.1
> >
> > This is a bugfix release for Kafka 2.2.0. All of
+1 non-binding
We've been running it for a few days in a few clusters, so far no
issues. I also ran unit tests and checked signatures.
Thanks Vahid for running this release
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 9:01 AM Andrew Schofield
wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Built and ran source and sink connectors.
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8390:
-
Summary: Replace CreateDelegationToken request/response with
automated protocol
Key: KAFKA-8390
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8390
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mickael Maison resolved KAFKA-8034.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Replace DeleteTopics request/response with automated proto
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP
On Thu, May 2, 2019 at 11:02 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> thanks, Jose.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Wed, May 1, 2019, at 14:44, Jose Armando Garcia Sancio wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start the voting for KIP-460:
> >
I was planning to write a KIP for the exact same feature!
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 7:24 PM Almog Gavra wrote:
>
> Hello Everyone!
>
> Kicking off the voting for
>
Congrats Matthias!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 6:07 AM Vahid Hashemian
wrote:
>
> Congratulations Matthias!
>
> --Vahid
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 9:39 PM Manikumar wrote:
>
> > Congrats Matthias!. well deserved.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:44 AM Dong Lin wrote:
> >
> > > Congratulations
Congratulations Harsha!
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 5:49 AM Manikumar wrote:
>
> Congrats Harsha!.
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 7:43 AM Dong Lin wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Sriharsh!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:46 AM Jun Rao wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, Everyone,
> > >
> > > Sriharsh Chintalapan
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8256:
-
Summary: Replace Heartbeat request/response with automated protocol
Key: KAFKA-8256
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8256
Project: Kafka
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:07 PM Andrew Schofield
wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I’d like to begin the voting thread for KIP-419. This is a minor KIP to add a
> new stopped() method to the SourceTask interface in Kafka Connect. Its
> purpose is to give the task a safe
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8196:
-
Summary: Replace InitProducerId request/response with automated
protocol
Key: KAFKA-8196
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8196
Project: Kafka
efault value in TopicConfig is 7 days, I think this is a
> sufficient default value. Do you have any motivations to set it to -1?
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:42 AM Mickael Maison
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > For consistency, should we also
+1 (non binding)
For consistency, should we also set retention.ms to -1 instead of
Long.MAX_VALUE?
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 3:59 PM Manikumar wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 9:04 PM Damian Guy wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 at 01:59, John
t; including
> > > > > Capital One, Goldman Sachs, ING, LinkedIn, Netflix, Pinterest,
> > > Rabobank,
> > > > > Target, The New York Times, Uber, Yelp, and Zalando, among others.
> > > > >
> > > > > A big thank you for the followi
osal for now.
>
> Perhaps we could even somehow do all of this in a custom CreateTopicPolicy?
> That would avoid the need for RPC changes, new configuration knobs, etc.
>
> best,
> Colin
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2018, at 08:43, Mickael Maison wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> &g
Bumping this thread once again
Ismael, have I answered your questions?
While this has received a few non-binding +1s, no committers have
voted yet. If you have concerns or questions, please let me know.
Thanks
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:51 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
>
> Bumping this
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8090:
-
Summary: Replace ControlledShutdown request/response with
automated protocol
Key: KAFKA-8090
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8090
Project: Kafka
+1 (non binding)
Thanks
On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 6:39 AM Satish Duggana wrote:
>
> Thanks for the KIP,
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> ~Satish.
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:58 PM Manikumar wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > Thanks for the KIP.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Manikumar
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8056:
-
Summary: Replace FindCoordinator request/response with automated
protocol
Key: KAFKA-8056
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8056
Project: Kafka
+1
I checked signatures, built from source and ran through quickstart
It's probably worth mentioning KIP-377 in the short release summary as
in many cloud environments access to zookeeper is disabled so many
users will benefit from it.
Also "- Added SSL support for custom principle name" -> "-
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8034:
-
Summary: Replace DeleteTopics request/response with automated
protocol
Key: KAFKA-8034
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8034
Project: Kafka
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-8010:
-
Summary: kafka-configs.sh does not allow setting config with an
equal in the value
Key: KAFKA-8010
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-8010
Project
+1 (non binding)
In the Metadata v8 section, it looks like the "authorized_operations"
field is missing under "topic_metadata". There's only the top-level
"authorized_operations" field.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 12:11 PM Rajini Sivaram wrote:
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> Yes, it makes sense to reduce
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-7997:
-
Summary: Replace SaslAuthenticate request/response with automated
protocol
Key: KAFKA-7997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7997
Project: Kafka
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-7972:
-
Summary: Replace SaslHandshake request/response with automated
protocol
Key: KAFKA-7972
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7972
Project: Kafka
+1 (non-binding)
We've used a tweaked JmxTool class to change log level for a while but
this is a significant improvement!
Thanks for the KIP
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 11:48 AM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
>
> Hey everybody, I'm starting a VOTE thread for KIP-412. This feature should
> significantly
Congrats Randall!
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 6:37 AM James Cheng wrote:
>
> Congrats, Randall! Well deserved!
>
> -James
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 14, 2019, at 6:16 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > The PMC of Apache Kafka is happy to announce another new committer
Congratulations Bill!
On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 7:52 AM Gurudatt Kulkarni
wrote:
> Congratulations Bill!
>
> On Thursday, February 14, 2019, Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
> > Congrats Bill!
> >
> > -Konstantine
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:42 PM Srinivas Reddy <
Bumping this thread as it's been a couple of weeks.
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:26 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Thanks Ismael for the feedback. I think your point has 2 parts:
> - Having the reset functionality in the AdminClient:
> The fact we have a command line too
+1 (non binding)
I built from source and ran Quickstart. All good. Thanks Colin
On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 12:43 AM Vahid Hashemian
wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I built from the source, and ran the Quickstart on Ubuntu 18.04 with Java 8.
> Some unit tests fail for me but none consistently across several
Thanks, that's a very interesting KIP!
I agree with Becket that a clearer config format is likely to help.
Have you considered using a config format similar to listeners (as
described in the "Updating SSL Keystore of an Existing Listener" in
the Kafka docs)?
Also worth noting that we already
Another bump.
Feedback and suggestions are always appreciated!
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 5:14 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We've not received any feedback yet on this KIP. We still believe this
> would be a nice improvement.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 201
this is necessary here
> (not saying it isn't).
>
> Ismael
>
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2019, 10:29 AM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ryanne for the feedback, all suggestions sounded good, I've
> > updated the KIP accordingly.
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > Thanks Mickael!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 17:39, Patrik Kleindl
> > > wrote:
> > &g
wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> > Thanks, sounds very helpful
> > Best regards
> > Patrik
> >
> > > Am 08.01.2019 um 18:10 schrieb Mickael Maison > >:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'd like to start the v
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for the KIP
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 5:47 PM vcgat...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2018/12/11 10:48:02, Rajini Sivaram wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have submitted a KIP to improve fairness in channel processing in
> > SocketServer to protect brokers from connection storms:
Congratulations Vahid! Well done!
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 6:42 AM Dongjin Lee wrote:
>
> Congratulations, Vahid!!
>
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 3:32 PM Dong Lin wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Vahid!
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 2:45 PM Jason Gustafson
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
Hi,
We've not received any feedback yet on this KIP. We still believe this
would be a nice improvement.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:27 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have submitted a KIP to handle topics and partitions creation when
> a cluster is not fully avail
Hi all,
I'd like to start the vote on KIP-396:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97551484
Thanks
It's now been a few weeks without any feedback. If I don't see
anything new, I'll start a vote early next week.
Thanks
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:00 PM Mickael Maison wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback Edo.
>
> 1) While the initial name was matching the Protocol, I agree it was
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Ryanne
On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:47 AM McCaig, Rhys wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding). Fantastic work on the KIP Ryanne.
>
> > On Dec 25, 2018, at 9:10 AM, Stephane Maarek
> > wrote:
> >
> > +1 ! Great stuff
> >
> > Stephane
> >
> > On Mon., 24 Dec. 2018, 12:07 pm Edoardo
Hi,
We have submitted a KIP to handle topics and partitions creation when
a cluster is not fully available:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-409%3A+Allow+creating+under-replicated+topics+and+partitions
As always, we welcome feedback and suggestions.
Thanks
Mickael and
A vote must stay open for _at least_ 72 hours to ensure people have a
chance to see it.
Apart from that these's no upper bound for the duration, some vote
threads are open for weeks
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 8:29 PM Harsha wrote:
>
> Hi,
>It might have slipped through. You can try calling
t; IBM Event Streams
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
>
>
> From: Mickael Maison
> To: dev
> Date: 30/11/2018 10:51
> Subject:[DISCUSS] KIP-396: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to
> AdminClient
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've written a K
Hi Jason,
Very cool KIP!
A couple of questions:
- I'm guessing the selector will be invoke after each rebalance so
every time the consumer is assigned a partition it will be able to
select it. Is that true?
- From the selector API, I'm not sure how the consumer will be able to
address some of
Hi Tom,
This is a very interesting KIP. If you are not going to continue
working on it, would it be ok for us to grab it and complete it?
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 7:06 PM Anna Povzner wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Just wanted to check what you think about the comments I made in my last
> message.
Hi,
I've written a KIP to add commit/list offsets operation to the AdminClient:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=97551484
Please take a look and let me know if you have any feedback. Thanks
Mickael
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-7689:
-
Summary: Add Commit/List Offsets Operations to AdminClient
Key: KAFKA-7689
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7689
Project: Kafka
Issue Type
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 4:32 PM Kevin Lu wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm bumping this thread as it has been a couple weeks with no activity.
>
> The proposed changes in this KIP are minor, but are extremely helpful for
> operators to immediately identify partitions
ozhang Wang, hashangayasri, huxi, huxihx, Ismael Juma,
> > Jagadesh Adireddi, Jason Gustafson, Jim Galasyn, Jimin Hsieh, Jimmy Casey,
> > Joan Goyeau, John Roesler, Jon Lee, jonathanskrzypek, Jun Rao, Kamal
> > Chandraprakash, Kevin Lafferty, Kevin Lu, Koen De Groote, Kon
skrzypek, Jun Rao, Kamal
> Chandraprakash, Kevin Lafferty, Kevin Lu, Koen De Groote, Konstantine
> Karantasis, lambdaliu, Lee Dongjin, Lincong Li, Liquan Pei, lucapette,
> Lucas Wang, Maciej Bryński, Magesh Nandakumar, Manikumar Reddy, Manikumar
> Reddy O, Mario Molina, Marko Stanković, Ma
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:16 AM Becket Qin wrote:
>
> Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding).
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM Harsha Chintalapani wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Harsha
> > On Nov 11, 2018, 3:49 PM -0800, Daniele Ascione ,
> > wrote:
> > > +1
+1 (non-binding)
- Checked signatures
- Ran through quickstart on kafka_2.12-2.0.1.tgz
- Built from source with Java 8
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 9:13 AM Satish Duggana wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Ran testAll/releaseTarGzAll on 2.0.1
> - Ran through quickstart of core/streams on builds
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-7589:
-
Summary: Allow configuring num.network.threads per listener
Key: KAFKA-7589
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7589
Project: Kafka
Issue
Mickael Maison created KAFKA-7588:
-
Summary: Rationalize configurations passed to pluggable APIs
Key: KAFKA-7588
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7588
Project: Kafka
Issue
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 1:28 PM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on KIP-377:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-377%3A+TopicCommand+to+use+AdminClient.
>
> Summary:
> The KIP basically proposes to add
It might be worth syncing with KIP-377 which is already planning to
make TopicCommand use the AdminClient and add a --bootstrap-server
argument.
Also in the proposed changes section, you mention the challenge of
finding the topic min ISR configuration. Using the
AdminClient.describeConfigs() API,
+1( non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018, 03:31 Harsha Chintalapani wrote:
> +1(binding). LGTM.
> -Harsha
> On Oct 20, 2018, 4:49 PM -0700, Dong Lin , wrote:
> > Thanks much for the KIP Patrick. Looks pretty good.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:17 AM
Hi,
These 2 classes have the same name but are serving different purposes
- Cluster.java is part of the public Java API [0] and allows to build
a representation of a Kafka Cluster including brokers, topics and
partitions.
- Cluster.scala is an internal class only used by the old and now
Congrats Manikumar!
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 7:17 PM Dong Lin wrote:
>
> Congratulations Manikumar!!
>
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:39 AM Jason Gustafson wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The PMC for Apache Kafka has invited Manikumar Reddy as a committer and we
> > are
> > pleased to announce that he
Hi Viktor,
Thanks for taking this task!
This is a very nice change as it will allow users to use this tool in
many Cloud environments where direct zookeeper access is not
available.
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:34 AM Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> This is the continuation of the old
Congratulations Colin!
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 11:17 Viktor Somogyi-Vass
wrote:
> Congrats Colin, well deserved! :)
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 10:58 AM Stanislav Kozlovski <
> stanis...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Colin!
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 9:51 AM Edoardo Comar wrote:
> >
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP, this is a very nice feature.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 4:56 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the KIP, Ron!
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 5:26 PM Ron Dagostino wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone. This KIP requires 1 more binding up-vote to be
Bumping this thread
It's a relatively small change that would help cloud environments with
load balancers fronting brokers
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 3:01 PM Edoardo Comar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> after some time we updated KIP-302 to reuse the config key introduced by
> KIP-235, with a different value
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 7:40 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 9/14/18 4:57 PM, Ismael Juma wrote:
> > Thanks for the KIP, +1 (binding).
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 4:56 PM Dhruvil Shah wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 7:05 AM Manikumar wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks for the KIP.
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:38 AM Harsha wrote:
>
> > +1 (Binding).
> > Thanks,
> > Harsha
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 9:06 PM, vito jeng wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> >
+1 (non binding)
Thanks for your perseverance, it's great to see this KIP finally
reaching completion!
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 4:58 AM Harsha wrote:
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Jason Gustafson wrote:
> > Great contribution! +1
> >
> > On Wed, Sep
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP!
On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 8:40 AM McCaig, Rhys wrote:
>
> Looks great Randall
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On Sep 9, 2018, at 7:17 PM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > Useful improvement, thanks Randall.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2018, 3:28 PM Randall Hauch
+1 (non binding)
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 3:14 PM Manikumar wrote:
>
> bump up! waiting for 2 more binding votes!
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 7:36 AM Satish Duggana
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 2:59 AM, Harsha wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > -Harsha
901 - 1000 of 1184 matches
Mail list logo
