Thanks Mickael, I think adding the new Exception resolves my concerns.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:47 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> Thanks Robert and Ryanne for the feedback.
>
> ReplicaAssignor implementations can throw an exception to indicate an
> assignment can't be computed. This is already what
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks Jason!
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:28 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1. Thanks!
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 3:04 PM Ron Dagostino wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding) -- Thanks, Jason!
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 2:04 PM Jason Gustafson
> wrote:
> >
> > >
Hi Jason,
Thanks for this KIP, I think this will be a huge operational improvement
and overall it looks great to me.
I'm not sure how much value the MaxActiveTransactionDuration metric adds,
given that we have the --find-hanging option in the tool. As you mention,
instances of these transactions
Hi Mickael,
Thanks for the KIP!
One question I have is around failure cases. Are ReplicaAssignor
implementations expected to always compute an assignment, or is it possible
for them to have unsatisfiable conditions? One example I can think of is a
requirement that at least one partition be placed
+1 (non-binding)
This will be great to have, thanks Jason!
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 4:29 AM Manikumar wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> Thanks for the KIP. LGTM.
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:12 PM Satish Duggana
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jason,
> > +1 (non binding) Thanks for the KIP!
> >
> > Do we need to
+1 (non-binding)
This will be good to have, thanks David!
Bob
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 6:08 AM Mickael Maison
wrote:
> +1 non binding
> Thank you!
>
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 9:07 PM Stanislav Kozlovski
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks for the simple but very useful KIP!
> > Be
+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP!
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 5:59 PM George Li
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
> Thanks for addressing the comments.
> George
>
> On Thursday, July 18, 2019, 05:03:58 PM PDT, Gwen Shapira <
> g...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> Renewing my +1, thank you Colin and
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks for the KIP, Colin!
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 8:27 AM Colin McCabe wrote:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> There is a jira -- KAFKA-8345. The PR is not quite ready yet, but
> hopefully soon :)
>
> best,
> Colin
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019, at 01:13, Viktor Somogyi-Vass wrote:
> > +1 (non-bind
Thanks for the KIP, Colin. I have a couple questions:
1. What's the reasoning for requiring cancellation of a reassignment before
submitting a new one? It seems like overriding an existing reassignment
could be done with a single update to
/brokers/topics/[topic]/partitions/[partitionId]/state and
Congratulations Colin!
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 1:51 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Congrats Colin! The was over due for some time :)
>
> -Matthias
>
> On 9/25/18 1:51 AM, Edoardo Comar wrote:
> > Congratulations Colin !
> > --
> >
> > Edoardo Comar
>
10 matches
Mail list logo
