Hello everyone,
Thanks to who have voted! The final count is :-
binding +1: 3 (Matthias, Guozhang, Bill)
non-binding +1: 3 (Boyang, Dongjin, John)
I'm closing this vote thread.
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:36 AM Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Sorry for bei
Hi,
Ok the voting thread is still open.
Thanks Regards
Omkar Mestry
On Sun, 9 Jun 2019 at 11:33 AM, Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Omkar,
>
> a KIP is accepted if there are 3 binding votes for it. So far, there are
> only 2. Hence, the KIP is not accepted yet. The vote stays open.
&
Thanks to everyone who have voted! I'm closing this vote thread with a
final count:
binding +1: 2 (Matthias, Guozhang)
non-binding +1: 2 (Boyang, Dongjin)
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:05 AM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> On Sat, Jun 1, 20
Hi all,
Since we seem to have an agreement in the discussion I would like to
start the vote on KIP-474.
KIP 474 :-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526545
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
Hi Dongjin,
I have updated the KIP please have a look and provide feedback on it.
KIP :-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526545
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 6:25 PM Dongjin Lee wrote:
> Hi Omkar,
>
> Thanks for the
We propose to deprecate the WindowStore#put(key, value), as it does not
have a timestamp as a parameter. The window store requires a timestamp to
map the key to a window frame. This method uses the current record
timestamp(as specified in the description of the method). There is a method
present
Hello,
Please provide access to create KIP on confluence. My user id is omanges.
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
looking is trunk.
Please help to solve this issue.
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
as
well.
PFA
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
