ions about the issue, and I opened a PR to
>> > > update the docs (that's still hoping to be reviewed and merged ...
>> hint
>> > > hint :-)
>> > > https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3035
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5290
>> > >
>> >
ull/3035
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5290
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Edo
> > > --------------
> > > Edoardo Comar
> > > IBM Message Hub
> > > eco...@uk.ibm.com
> &g
> IBM Message Hub
> > eco...@uk.ibm.com
> > IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Date: 30/05/2017 10:51
> > Subject:
> Edo
> --
> Edoardo Comar
> IBM Message Hub
> eco...@uk.ibm.com
> IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
>
>
>
>
> From: Mickael Maison <mickael.mai...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Date:
Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-164 Add unavailablePartitionCount and
per-partition Unavailable metrics
+1
It's a mystery how this didn't already exist as it's one of the key
cluster's health indicator
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Gwen Shapira <g...@confluent.io> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sounds
+1
It's a mystery how this didn't already exist as it's one of the key
cluster's health indicator
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Gwen Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sounds good. I was sure this existed already for some reason :)
>
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:06 AM Dong Lin
Hi,
Sounds good. I was sure this existed already for some reason :)
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 11:06 AM Dong Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We created KIP-164 to propose adding per-partition metric *Unavailable* and
> per-broker metric *UnavailablePartitionCount*
>
> The KIP wik can be
Hi,
We created KIP-164 to propose adding per-partition metric *Unavailable* and
per-broker metric *UnavailablePartitionCount*
The KIP wik can be found at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-164-+Add+unavailablePartitionCount+and+per-partition+Unavailable+metrics
.
Comments are