gree with you on
giving more info to developers who are using the Scala API.
Thanks
Paolo
From: Colin McCabe
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:49:59 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Cli
Paolo
From: Colin McCabe
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 9:49:59 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi Paolo,
This looks like a good proposal. I think it's probably ready to take it
to a
t;http://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
> Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
>
>
> ____________
> From: Colin McCabe
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 4:34 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to th
tp://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
> > Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Paolo Patierno
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 7:38 AM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject
n/paolopatierno>
> > Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Paolo Patierno
> > Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 7:38 AM
> > To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-20
opatierno<http://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
> Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
>
>
> ________________
> From: Paolo Patierno
> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 7:38 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-20
tp://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
From: Paolo Patierno
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2017 7:38 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Ad
ierno<http://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
> Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
>
>
> ________________________
> From: Paolo Patierno
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:37 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS
erno.wordpress.com/>
>
>
> ____________________
> From: Paolo Patierno
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2017 1:37 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the
> new Admin Client API
>
> @Colin
afka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
@Colin Yes you are right I'll update the KIP-204 mentioning the related ACL
permission DELETE on TOPIC
@Dong @Ismael
Considering future improvements on this, it makes sense to me
is the KafkaFuture returned by all() call? Should it
> > be
> > > a
> > > > > > > Map instead?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Good point.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers,
> > > > > > Colin
>
be
> > > a
> > > > > > > Map instead?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Good point.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > cheers,
> > > > > > Colin
> > > > > >
> > > >
in
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jiangjie (Becket) QIn
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Paolo Pa
he new
> > > > > > TopicDeletionPolicy suggested by the KIP-201.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Paolo Patierno
> > > > > > Senior Software Engineer (IoT) @ Red Hat
> > > > > > Microsoft
t; > > >
> > > > > I hope for more comments on this KIP-204 so that we can start a
> vote
> > on
> > > > > Monday.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
; > >
> > > >
> > > > Paolo Patierno
> > > > Senior Software Engineer (IoT) @ Red Hat
> > > > Microsoft MVP on Azure & IoT
> > > > Microsoft Azure Advisor
> > > >
> > > > Twitter : @ppatierno<http://twitt
zure & IoT
> > > Microsoft Azure Advisor
> > >
> > > Twitter : @ppatierno<http://twitter.com/ppatierno>
> > > Linkedin : paolopatierno<http://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
> > > Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopa
patierno<http://twitter.com/ppatierno>
> > Linkedin : paolopatierno<http://it.linkedin.com/in/paolopatierno>
> > Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
> >
> >
> > ________________
> > From: Paolo Patierno
> > Sent: Thursday, September 2
> From: Paolo Patierno
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 5:56 AM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the
> new Admin Client API
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I have just updated the KIP-
ent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 5:56 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi,
I have just updated the KIP-204 description with the new TopicDeletionPolicy
suggested by the KIP-201.
Paolo Patierno
Senior Softwa
perience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
From: Tom Bentley
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:32 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi Paolo,
I guess a RecordDeletionPolicy should work at the
_
From: Tom Bentley
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 4:32 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi Paolo,
I guess a RecordDeletionPolicy should work at the partition level, whereas
the TopicDeleti
t;
>
>
> ____________
> From: Tom Bentley
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 2:55 PM
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the
> new Admin Client API
>
> Hi Edoardo and Paolo,
>
&
Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi Edoardo and Paolo,
On 26 September 2017 at 14:10, Paolo Patierno wrote:
> What could be useful use cases for having a RecordsDeletePolicy ? Records
> can't be deleted for a topic name ? Starting
Hi Edoardo and Paolo,
On 26 September 2017 at 14:10, Paolo Patierno wrote:
> What could be useful use cases for having a RecordsDeletePolicy ? Records
> can't be deleted for a topic name ? Starting from a specific offset ?
>
I can imagine some users wanting to prohibit using this API completel
, 2017 2:12 PM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi Edoardo,
reading the KIP-170 at this point :
3) API Authorization
Given the potential damage that can be caused if this API is used by mistake,
it is impor
IBM Message Hub
IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, SO21 2JN
From: Paolo Patierno
To: "dev@kafka.apache.org"
Date: 26/09/2017 15:12
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation
to the new Admin Client API
Hi Edoardo,
reading the KIP-170 at this
/v2/url?u=http-3A__paolopatierno.wordpress.com_&d=DwIFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=7f9IdD9OiWfZojnX4FN8OUimAl_0Q72yxvE8Nz_QdpU&s=RcYQ4n1Fcl2vHgy2Aj_J9wUO3ZUaFgl8vCZ4slCD5ro&e=
>
________
From: Tom Bentley
Sent: Tu
wordpress.com_&d=DwIFAw&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=EzRhmSah4IHsUZVekRUIINhltZK7U0OaeRo7hgW4_tQ&m=7f9IdD9OiWfZojnX4FN8OUimAl_0Q72yxvE8Nz_QdpU&s=RcYQ4n1Fcl2vHgy2Aj_J9wUO3ZUaFgl8vCZ4slCD5ro&e=
>
____________________
From: Tom Bentley
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:55 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.or
;
Blog : DevExperience<http://paolopatierno.wordpress.com/>
From: Tom Bentley
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 8:55 AM
To: dev@kafka.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] KIP-204 : adding records deletion operation to the new
Admin Client API
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for t
Hi Paolo,
Thanks for the KIP.
What errors can be anticipated for the API method (See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5445)?
It's not mentioned in KIP-107, but maybe now is a good time to consider
whether there should be some kind of DeleteRecordsPolicy, like there is for
creating top
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Paolo Patierno
> wrote:
>
> > Hi devs,
> >
> >
> > I'd like to start a discussion around adding the delete records
> operation,
> > already available at protocol level and in the "legacy" A
+1
On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Paolo Patierno wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
>
> I'd like to start a discussion around adding the delete records operation,
> already available at protocol level and in the "legacy" Admin Client in
> Scala, to the "new" Admin Client API in Java.
>
>
> https://cwiki.apac
Hi devs,
I'd like to start a discussion around adding the delete records operation,
already available at protocol level and in the "legacy" Admin Client in Scala,
to the "new" Admin Client API in Java.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-204+%3A+adding+records+deletion+opera
34 matches
Mail list logo
