I've made a pass on the KIP and it looks good to me as well. I think we can
start a voting thread for it.
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 10:27 PM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Omkar.
>
> I think this is rather uncontroversial, and I also support this KIP. I
> think you can start a VOTE.
Thanks for the KIP Omkar.
I think this is rather uncontroversial, and I also support this KIP. I
think you can start a VOTE. People can still chime in on the discuss
thread if they have any concerns.
-Matthias
On 5/27/19 11:50 PM, Dongjin Lee wrote:
> Hi Omkar,
>
> Looks good to me. Thanks!
>
Hi Omkar,
Looks good to me. Thanks!
Is there anyone who has some comments about the KIP?
Thanks,
Dongjin
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 3:24 PM omkar mestry wrote:
> Hi Dongjin,
>
> I have updated the KIP please have a look and provide feedback on it.
>
> KIP :-
>
Hi Dongjin,
I have updated the KIP please have a look and provide feedback on it.
KIP :-
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526545
Thanks & Regards
Omkar Mestry
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 6:25 PM Dongjin Lee wrote:
> Hi Omkar,
>
> Thanks for the KIP. However,
Hi Omkar,
Thanks for the KIP. However, discussion thread should include a link to the
KIP document. Since you omitted it, here is the link.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=115526545
As far as I understand, the point of the KIP is the current API can result
in
We propose to deprecate the WindowStore#put(key, value), as it does not
have a timestamp as a parameter. The window store requires a timestamp to
map the key to a window frame. This method uses the current record
timestamp(as specified in the description of the method). There is a method
present
