This seems not very controversial, so I will go ahead and move to a vote in
the next couple days.
Thanks,
Jason
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 10:23 AM Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hey Colin,
>
> Thanks for the suggestions. I've clarified the use of the API overrides
> and the request timeout.
>
> I think
Hey Colin,
Thanks for the suggestions. I've clarified the use of the API overrides and
the request timeout.
I think exponential backoff is a great idea. Can we do a separate KIP for
this? I think we can add it to the consumer and producer at the same time.
-Jason
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 2:01 PM
Thanks for the KIP, this makes sense to me. It will be good to align the
AdminClient better with the consumer and producer when it comes to timeouts.
Ismael
On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 12:06 PM Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wrote a short KIP to address a longstanding issue with timeout beha
Hi Jason,
Thanks for the KIP. I think this is a long-overdue improvement.
It would be good to clarify that the "timeout" values for the options classes
will now refer to the API timeouts, not to the request timeouts. I think this
is implied by the KIP, but it would be good to spell it out.
O
Hi All,
I wrote a short KIP to address a longstanding issue with timeout behavior
in the AdminClient:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-533%3A+Add+default+api+timeout+to+AdminClient
.
Take a look and let me know what you think.
Thanks,
Jason
