Thanks Guozhang! Will wait and see if there are more comments.
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:17 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Thanks Boyang, the newly added example looks good to me.
>
> On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Boyang Chen
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Guozhang,
> >
> > I have added an example of the
Thanks Boyang, the newly added example looks good to me.
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 2:47 PM Boyang Chen
wrote:
> Hey Guozhang,
>
> I have added an example of the producer API usage under new improvements.
> Let me know if this looks good to you.
>
> Boyang
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:38 PM Boyang
Hey Guozhang,
I have added an example of the producer API usage under new improvements.
Let me know if this looks good to you.
Boyang
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 1:38 PM Boyang Chen
wrote:
> That's a good suggestion Jason. Adding a dedicated PRODUCER_FENCED error
> should help distinguish
That's a good suggestion Jason. Adding a dedicated PRODUCER_FENCED error
should help distinguish exceptions and could safely mark
INVALID_PRODUCER_EPOCH exception as non-fatal in the new code. Updated the
KIP.
Boyang
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 12:18 PM Jason Gustafson wrote:
> Hey Boyang,
>
>
Hey Boyang,
Thanks for the KIP. I think the main problem we've identified here is that
the current errors conflate transaction timeouts with producer fencing. The
first of these ought to be recoverable, but we cannot distinguish it. The
suggestion to add a new error code makes sense to me, but it
Yep, updated the KIP, thanks!
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:11 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Regarding 2), sounds good, I saw UNKNOWN_PRODUCER_ID is properly handled
> today in produce / add-partitions-to-txn / add-offsets-to-txn / end-txn
> responses, so that should be well covered.
>
> Could you
Regarding 2), sounds good, I saw UNKNOWN_PRODUCER_ID is properly handled
today in produce / add-partitions-to-txn / add-offsets-to-txn / end-txn
responses, so that should be well covered.
Could you reflect this in the wiki page that the broker should be
responsible for using different error codes
Thanks Guozhang for the review!
On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 5:47 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> Hello Boyang,
>
> Thank you for the proposed KIP. Just some minor comments below:
>
> 1. Could you also describe which producer APIs could potentially throw the
> new TransactionTimedOutException, and also how
Hello Boyang,
Thank you for the proposed KIP. Just some minor comments below:
1. Could you also describe which producer APIs could potentially throw the
new TransactionTimedOutException, and also how should callers handle them
differently (i.e. just to make your description more concrete as
Hey there,
I would like to start discussion for KIP-588:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-588%3A+Allow+producers+to+recover+gracefully+from+transaction+timeouts
which aims to improve Producer resilience to transaction timeout due to
transient system gaps.
Best,
Boyang
10 matches
Mail list logo
