Hi Luke,
Thanks for the response, I have removed the PR link in the KIP (it was
already in the JIRA issue) and I have also updated the code that generates
the documentation for
https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#brokerconfigs_listeners (I also
added an example of an IPv4+IPv6 listener configu
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the update.
The "listener" config description should also be updated:
https://kafka.apache.org/documentation/#brokerconfigs_listeners
We stated: Listener names and port numbers must be unique.
It'll be wrong after this KIP.
Also, the PR link should not be put onto the KIP.
Hi Luke,
I have updated the KIP to make it clear that we are only talking about
listeners and not advertised listeners. I have also updated/rebased the PR
at https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/11478 to add upgrade notes about
the suggested change. I am not sure if there is an additional place wh
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for the KIP.
I have a question:
If I remembered correctly, the "advertised listeners" already support
duplicated ports, so your KIP should only focus on "listeners"
configuration, is that right? If so, could you please make it clear in KIP,
to mention that your change only apply
Since no one has commented on either this thread or the original one I will
summon a vote by the end of this week.
Regards
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 5:28 PM Matthew de Detrich <
matthew.dedetr...@aiven.io> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to start a discussion for KIP-797 which is about a
Hello everyone,
I would like to start a discussion for KIP-797 which is about allowing
duplicate listeners on the same port in the specific case where one host is
an IPv4 address and the other host is an IPv6 address.
The proposal is here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?
