Thank Colin.
> One last note: if we do this, we should pass the UUID of the topic as
well as the name.
Sure, adding it to the KIP.
> On the minus side, the stated use-case (preventing deletion of
__consumer_offsets) seems easy to solve via ACLs. The CreateTopics case is
different... it's not as
Hi Jorge,
On the plus side, the change is small and pretty easy to support.
On the minus side, the stated use-case (preventing deletion of
__consumer_offsets) seems easy to solve via ACLs. The CreateTopics case is
different... it's not as easy to solve via ACLs because people wanted to
Thanks Christo!
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 13:02, Christo Lolov wrote:
> Heya Jorge,
>
> Thank you for the KIP!
>
> This feature sounds great to me since I have encountered problems with
> this, so I am supporting it. Do you have any idea why the previous KIPs
> were abandoned - I went through the
Heya Jorge,
Thank you for the KIP!
This feature sounds great to me since I have encountered problems with
this, so I am supporting it. Do you have any idea why the previous KIPs
were abandoned - I went through the email conversations and pull requests,
but I didn't find a good reason?
Best,
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a discussion for KIP-934 <
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-934%3A+Add+DeleteTopicPolicy>
which proposes adding a new policy for when deleting topics.
There have been related KIPs in the past that haven't been accepted and
seem
