[GitHub] [kafka-site] miguno commented on pull request #334: KAFKA-12393: Document multi-tenancy considerations

2021-03-04 Thread GitBox
miguno commented on pull request #334: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/334#issuecomment-790412618 Thanks all for reviewing, much appreciated! This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [kafka-site] miguno commented on pull request #334: KAFKA-12393: Document multi-tenancy considerations

2021-03-02 Thread GitBox
miguno commented on pull request #334: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/334#issuecomment-789009875 PR updated with reviewer feedback. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [kafka-site] miguno commented on pull request #334: KAFKA-12393: Document multi-tenancy considerations

2021-03-01 Thread GitBox
miguno commented on pull request #334: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/334#issuecomment-788696584 @bbejeck wrote in https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/334#pullrequestreview-600990037: > Also, @miguno, can you create an identical PR to go against docs in AK trunk?

[GitHub] [kafka-site] miguno commented on pull request #334: KAFKA-12393: Document multi-tenancy considerations

2021-03-01 Thread GitBox
miguno commented on pull request #334: URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/334#issuecomment-788089637 cc to committer @rajinisivaram as the SME on this subject, and who has the most context This is an automated