[GitHub] kafka-site issue #36: Streams standalone docs

2016-12-13 Thread guozhangwang
Github user guozhangwang commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/36 Merged, thanks! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes s

[GitHub] kafka-site issue #36: Streams standalone docs

2016-12-09 Thread guozhangwang
Github user guozhangwang commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/36 Thanks @derrickdoo ! Please add me to reviewers list when you created the PR. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] kafka-site issue #36: Streams standalone docs

2016-12-09 Thread derrickdoo
Github user derrickdoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/36 @guozhangwang yes, 2 things need to happen to new copies of stuff in side the versioned docs folder. 1. streams.html will need to have the full shell around it, so the includes at the

[GitHub] kafka-site issue #36: Streams standalone docs

2016-12-08 Thread guozhangwang
Github user guozhangwang commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/36 Thanks @derrickdoo , LGTM overall. One meta question: Does any of those changes need to be in `kafka`'s docs folder as well? During each release we will do a copy-paste from the built

[GitHub] kafka-site issue #36: Streams standalone docs

2016-12-08 Thread derrickdoo
Github user derrickdoo commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/kafka-site/pull/36 @guozhangwang here's a PR for the standalone Streams docs page --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do