> The voting has passed. Dong Lin (binding) is a committer.
Thanks for the kind reminder. Let me correct the voting result (see below):
+3 (binding)
1) Jason Gustafson
2) Gwen Shapira
3) Dong Lin
+3 (non-binding)
1) Colin McCabe
2) Manikumar
3) Vahid S Hashemian
KIP-338 has passed. Thank you
Chia-Ping Tsai,
The voting has passed. Dong Lin (binding) is a committer.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:24 AM Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> Current voting result is shown below.
>
> +2 (binding)
> 1) Jason Gustafson
> 2) Gwen Shapira
>
> +4 (non-binding)
> 1) Colin McCabe
> 2) Manikumar
> 3) Dong Lin
>
Current voting result is shown below.
+2 (binding)
1) Jason Gustafson
2) Gwen Shapira
+4 (non-binding)
1) Colin McCabe
2) Manikumar
3) Dong Lin
4) Vahid S Hashemian
Need one more binding vote please
Cheers,
Chia-Ping
On 2018/07/16 08:10:51, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> The
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 11:47 PM Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> cheers,
> Colin
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018, at 01:10, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > The discussion[1] of KIP-338[2] did not get any objection for last 6
> > days so it is time to start the
+1 (non-binding)
cheers,
Colin
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018, at 01:10, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> The discussion[1] of KIP-338[2] did not get any objection for last 6
> days so it is time to start the voting thread.
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> [1]
>
>
> (just a double check) the option name used in kip-338 is
> "--exclude-internal" rather than "--exclude-internal-topics". Do you prefer
> "--exclude-internal-topics"?
Nah, just a typo on my part. I think --exclude-internal is clear enough
given the name of the tool. Sorry for the confusion.
+1 (binding)
Thank you for the improvement!
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 4:10 AM, Chia-Ping Tsai wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> The discussion[1] of KIP-338[2] did not get any objection for last 6 days
> so it is time to start the voting thread.
>
> Thanks for your time!
>
> [1]
hi Jason
> I think eventually we'd want --exclude-internal-topics to be the default,
(just a double check) the option name used in kip-338 is "--exclude-internal"
rather than "--exclude-internal-topics". Do you prefer
"--exclude-internal-topics"?
Cheers,
Chia-Ping
On 2018/07/17 19:14:09,
Hi, thanks for the KIP. +1 from me.
I think eventually we'd want --exclude-internal-topics to be the default,
but it seems reasonable to keep the current behavior for compatibility.
-Jason
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Dong Lin wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks!
> Dong
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at
+1
Thanks!
Dong
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Vahid S Hashemian <
vahidhashem...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks!
> --Vahid
>
>
>
>
> From: Chia-Ping Tsai
> To:
> Date: 07/16/2018 01:11 AM
> Subject:[VOTE] KIP-338 Support to exclude the internal topics in
>
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks!
--Vahid
From: Chia-Ping Tsai
To:
Date: 07/16/2018 01:11 AM
Subject:[VOTE] KIP-338 Support to exclude the internal topics in
kafka-topics.sh command
hi folks,
The discussion[1] of KIP-338[2] did not get any objection for last 6 days
so it is
hi folks,
The discussion[1] of KIP-338[2] did not get any objection for last 6 days so it
is time to start the voting thread.
Thanks for your time!
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9bd4e61b73c901b51132ada49743b9b703d40b85fc4eeaa5c9099900@%3Cdev.kafka.apache.org%3E
[2]
12 matches
Mail list logo