Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-25 Thread Allen Wang
There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we consider the proposal accepted? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Joel Koshy wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Aditya Auradkar < > aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-25 Thread Neha Narkhede
Yes. Thanks for driving this. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Allen Wang wrote: > There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we consider the proposal > accepted? > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Joel Koshy wrote: > > > +1

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-25 Thread Allen Wang
Cool. Thank you all for comments and participation. On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Neha Narkhede wrote: > Yes. Thanks for driving this. > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Allen Wang wrote: > > > There are 4 binding +1 and 4 non-binding +1. Shall we

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-19 Thread Joel Koshy
+1 (binding) On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Aditya Auradkar < aaurad...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Grant Henke wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-19 Thread Aditya Auradkar
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Grant Henke wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-19 Thread Ismael Juma
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Onur Karaman > > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-18 Thread Guozhang Wang
+1 (binding) On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Onur Karaman wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > > > Allen, > > > > Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1 > > > > Could other people take a look at the

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-18 Thread Jun Rao
Allen, Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1 Could other people take a look at the latest proposal and vote on it? Thanks, Jun On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Allen Wang wrote: > I would like to call for a vote for KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment. > > The latest

Re: [VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-18 Thread Onur Karaman
+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Jun Rao wrote: > Allen, > > Thanks for updating the KIP wiki. +1 > > Could other people take a look at the latest proposal and vote on it? > > Thanks, > > Jun > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 4:30 PM, Allen Wang

[VOTE] KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment

2016-01-04 Thread Allen Wang
I would like to call for a vote for KIP-36 - Rack aware replica assignment. The latest proposal is at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-36 +Rack+aware+replica+assignment Thanks, Allen