Hello everyone,
this is to warn that actual implementation of KIP-418 differs with the
approved specification in two points:
1. Instead of multiple overloaded variants of Branched.with we now have
Branched.withFunction (for functions) and Branched.withConsumer (for
consumers). This is
I am late, but I am also +1 (binding).
-Matthias
On 7/6/20 2:16 AM, Ivan Ponomarev wrote:
> Wow!
>
> So excited to hear that!
>
> Thanks for your collaboration, now it's my turn to write a PR.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ivan
>
> 04.07.2020 20:16, John Roesler пишет:
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> Congratulations!
Wow!
So excited to hear that!
Thanks for your collaboration, now it's my turn to write a PR.
Regards,
Ivan
04.07.2020 20:16, John Roesler пишет:
Hi Ivan,
Congratulations! It looks like you have 3 binding and 2 non-binding votes, so
you can announce this KIP as accepted and follow up with
Hi Ivan,
Congratulations! It looks like you have 3 binding and 2 non-binding votes, so
you can announce this KIP as accepted and follow up with a PR.
Thanks,
John
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 20:46, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> Thanks for the KIP Ivan, +1 (binding).
>
> -Bill
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020
Thanks for the KIP Ivan, +1 (binding).
-Bill
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 7:22 PM Guozhang Wang wrote:
> +1 (binding). Thanks Ivan!
>
>
> Guozhang
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:55 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
> quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan!
+1 (binding). Thanks Ivan!
Guozhang
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 3:55 AM Jorge Esteban Quilcate Otoya <
quilcate.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan!
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:07 PM John Roesler wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Ivan!
> >
> > I’m +1
This will be a great addition. Thanks Ivan!
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:07 PM John Roesler wrote:
> Thanks, Ivan!
>
> I’m +1 (binding)
>
> -John
>
> On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 17:24, Ivan Ponomarev wrote:
> > Hello all!
> >
> > I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes
Thanks, Ivan!
I’m +1 (binding)
-John
On Thu, May 28, 2020, at 17:24, Ivan Ponomarev wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes deprecation of
> current `branch` method and provides a method-chaining based API for
> branching.
>
>
Hello all!
I'd like to start the vote for KIP-418 which proposes deprecation of
current `branch` method and provides a method-chaining based API for
branching.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-418%3A+A+method-chaining+way+to+branch+KStream
Regards,
Ivan
